News » International

Updated: September 28, 2009 13:04 IST

Germany’s Social Democrats hit historic low

print   ·   T  T  
German Chancellor Angela Merkel of the Christian Democratic Party, reacts after the German general elections in Berlin, Sunday, Sept. 27, 2009. Photo: AP
AP German Chancellor Angela Merkel of the Christian Democratic Party, reacts after the German general elections in Berlin, Sunday, Sept. 27, 2009. Photo: AP

Germany’s Social Democrats thought their election result would be bad — but not this bad.

The nation’s main centre-left party was ejected unceremoniously from government Sunday after 11 years, picking up easily its worst share of the vote since World War II.

“There is no talking around it: this is a bitter defeat,” Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Social Democratic sobered challenger, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, told supporters at the party’s Berlin headquarters.

Ms. Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union and its Bavaria-only sister, the Christian Social Union, won 33.8 per cent of the vote and the Social Democrats took 23 per cent. The Free Democrats captured 14.6 per cent, the Left Party 11.9 per cent and the Greens 10.7 per cent.

That gave the conservatives 239 seats and the Free Democrats 93 in the lower house — for a comfortable centre-right majority of 332 seats to 290. The Social Democrats won 146, the Left Party 76 and the Greens 68.

Mr. Steinmeier said he hoped to be a strong opposition leader, and party chairman Franz Muentefering said he planned to stay on, but neither immediately offered a vision for the party’s future.

“This is shocking,” Hans-Gerd Conrad, 39, an 11-year member of the Social Democrats, or SPD, said as he watched the exit poll results flash up on television. “I knew it wouldn’t be a great result, but this is even worse than I expected.”

In 2005 the party had snared an equal share of Ms. Merkel’s government and many of its top jobs — including the Foreign Ministry for Mr. Steinmeier — after finishing just behind her conservatives with 34.2 per cent of the vote.

But the outgoing “grand coalition” has not been kind to the party, which on Sunday plunged below its previous postwar worst of 28.8 per cent in 1953.

It was squeezed both by Ms. Merkel’s popularity and the opposition Left Party, whose hardline opposition to economic reform drained the Social Democrats both of supporters and votes.

“The people who voted for the Left Party now, and not us, did so because they want government to take care of everything and they feel that the SPD is not doing that anymore,” Mr. Conrad said.

In opposition, the Social Democrats will have time to resolve their dysfunctional relationship with the Left Party — which combines ex-communists with former Social Democrats who were alienated by the SPD’s embrace of welfare-state cuts.

Mr. Steinmeier and Mr. Muentefering refused to deal with the Left Party at national level — citing its radical economic stance and call for German soldiers’ immediate withdrawal from Afghanistan, as well as the presence in its leadership of abrasive former SPD chairman Oskar Lafontaine.

However, they have sanctioned alliances at regional level and conceded that national alliances may one day be possible — a stance that has been something of a problem for the SPD’s credibility.

Opposition is likely to result in the SPD moving closer to the Left Party.

Mr. Lafontaine celebrated his new party’s result as a “big day for the Left.” He declared that it “has now established itself as a party” by entering parliament for the second time. Projections showed the party with more than 10 per cent of the vote.

He said his is the only party that opposes the policies which abetted the economic crisis.

“We are the only party that stands against the current system,” Mr. Lafontaine said.

Keywords: GermanySocial Democrats

More In: International | News







Recent Article in International

A woman wears stickers on her face on a ‘short walk to freedom’ march in
Edinburgh on Thursday. Photo: Reuters

Scottish regions bursting with 'Yes' enthusiasm

‘Staying with the Union will mean more unemployment and more people on benefits’ »