Church of England votes against women bishops

Some took heart in the fact that both the bishops and the clergy voted overwhelmingly in favour. But among the laity, the vote fell short, with 132-74.

November 21, 2012 03:26 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 09:53 pm IST - LONDON

Dr Rowan Williams, the outgoing Archbishop of Canterbury, is hugged by a female colleague after draft legislation introducing the first women bishops in the Church of England failed to receive final approval from the Church of England General Synod, at Church House in central London Tuesday Nov. 20, 2012. The defeat was a setback for the Archbishop, who retires at the end of December, and his successor, Bishop Justin Welby. Both had strongly endorsed a proposed compromise that they had hoped would end decades of debate on the issue.  (AP Photo/ Yui Mok/PA Pool)

Dr Rowan Williams, the outgoing Archbishop of Canterbury, is hugged by a female colleague after draft legislation introducing the first women bishops in the Church of England failed to receive final approval from the Church of England General Synod, at Church House in central London Tuesday Nov. 20, 2012. The defeat was a setback for the Archbishop, who retires at the end of December, and his successor, Bishop Justin Welby. Both had strongly endorsed a proposed compromise that they had hoped would end decades of debate on the issue. (AP Photo/ Yui Mok/PA Pool)

The Church of England was on Wednesday facing what was described as the ``biggest crisis’’ in recent memory after its General Synod rejected -- by a narrow vote -- a proposal to appoint women bishops sparking accusations of "institutionalised sexism’’.

The Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, who had worked hard to bring about a compromise, said the Church had lost a "measure of credibility’’ and would be seen as "wilfully blind’’ to modern trends and priorities.

"Whatever the motivations for voting yesterday, whatever the theological principle on which people acted and spoke, the fact remains that a great deal of this discussion is not intelligible to our wider society - worse than that, it seems that we are wilfully blind to some of the trends and priorities in that wider society," he said as modernisers vowed to continue their campaign.

Dr Williams, who steps down at the end of December, said the Church had "a lot of explaining to do’’ and spoke of his ``deep personal sadness’’ that years of hard work had been undermined by the vote.

"Of course I hoped and prayed that this particular business would be at another stage before I left, and... it is a personal sadness, a deep personal sadness that that is not the case. I can only wish the synod and the archbishop all good things and every blessing with resolving this in the shortest possible time," he said.

His successor Justin Welby, the bishop of Durham, who had appealed to the synod to vote in favour of women bishops, described it as a ``very grim day, most of all for women priests and supporters’’.

Under the rules, the move cannot be revived in the same form until 2015.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.