‘Hidden’ vetoes must go, India tells UN

“Counter-terror mechanisms such as sanctions panels should not engender impunity”.

April 16, 2016 03:09 am | Updated November 17, 2021 05:10 am IST - WASHINGTON

In this Jan. 27, 2000 photo Jaish-e-Mohammad chief Maulana Masood Azhar (wearing glasses and white turban) arrives in Islamabad. China has recently blocked India’s bid to designate  Azhar a terrorist.

In this Jan. 27, 2000 photo Jaish-e-Mohammad chief Maulana Masood Azhar (wearing glasses and white turban) arrives in Islamabad. China has recently blocked India’s bid to designate Azhar a terrorist.

India has sought transparency in the U.N. procedures to designate a group or an individual terrorist. The demand comes days after China blocked its bid to designate Jaish-e-Mohammad chief Masood Azhar a terrorist.

The existing rules allow Security Council members to oppose any move in the sanctions committees in a clandestine manner and without offering any explanation. The sanctions committees can take decisions only unanimously, and this means any of the 15 members can veto a move. For instance, China put a ‘technical hold’ on action against Azhar, and India came to know only informally from members of the council.

This amounts to allowing a “hidden veto” for every member of the council, Syed Akbaruddin, Permanent Representative of India to the U.N., said at an open debate.

The Security Council has Al-Qaeda, Taliban and Islamic State Sanctions Committees that can mandate international sanctions, which will require countries to freeze the targeted group’s or individual’s assets, ban designated individuals from travelling and prevent the supply of weapons, technology and other aid. Earlier too, China delayed moves against the Pakistan-based terror groups such as the Jamaat-Ud-Dawa and the Lashkar-e-Taiba.

“The procedures of unanimity and anonymity of the Al-Qaeda, Taliban & IS Sanctions Committees need to be revisited… Each of the 15 members now has a veto and none, except these 15 members, is told of who is it that has wielded the veto in a specific instance. Counter-terror mechanisms, such as the Sanctions Committees, need to build trust, not engender impunity, by the use of this ‘hidden’ veto,” Mr. Akbaruddin said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.