BP, others blamed for failures

January 06, 2011 09:44 pm | Updated November 11, 2016 05:45 am IST - Washington:

SYSTEMIC FAILURES: The Deepwater Horizon oil rig burning after an explosion in the Gulf of Mexico off the southeast tip of Louisiana, in this April 21, 2010 file photo.

SYSTEMIC FAILURES: The Deepwater Horizon oil rig burning after an explosion in the Gulf of Mexico off the southeast tip of Louisiana, in this April 21, 2010 file photo.

Oil companies BP, Transocean and Halliburton share the blame for the 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico along with government regulators who failed to rigorously examine industry practices, according to the final findings of a Presidential panel investigating the causes of the spill.

In a chapter of the report, made available in advance of the full report’s release, the panel said that the blowout of BP’s Macondo well in the Gulf was not the product of a series of “aberrational decisions made by rogue industry or government officials that could not have been anticipated or expected to occur again.”

Rather, the panel argued, the root causes of the explosion and subsequent environmental catastrophe were systemic and in the absence of significant reform in both industry practices and government policies, they might well recur.

The BP-operated Deepwater Horizon rig sank on April 20 last year, following an explosion that killed 11 workers. Since then nearly five million barrels of oil from the well spewed into the Gulf, causing widespread environmental damage exceeding in scale the Exxon Valdez spill near Alaska in 1989.

The panel of experts also specifically noted that the missteps involved were rooted in systemic failures by industry management extending beyond BP to contractors, and also by failures of government to provide effective regulatory oversight of offshore drilling.

Describing their findings as “considerable and significant,” they said that firstly each of the mistakes made on the rig and onshore by industry and government increased the risk of a well blowout; and secondly the cumulative risk that resulted from these decisions and actions was both unreasonably large and avoidable.

In its report the panel recalled that the immediate cause of the Macondo blowout was a failure to contain hydrocarbon pressures in the well and there were three ways to have contained those pressures – the cement at the bottom of the well, the mud in the well and in the riser, and the blowout preventer.

“But mistakes and failures to appreciate risk compromised each of those potential barriers, steadily depriving the rig crew of safeguards until the blowout was inevitable and, at the very end, uncontrollable,” the report said.

Media reported a statement by BP this week in which the company underscored that the panel had apportioned blame to a number of companies, and not BP alone. “Even prior to the conclusion of the commission’s investigation, BP instituted significant changes designed to further strengthen safety and risk management,” a BP official was quoted as saying in the New York Times. BP’s share price rose after it became clear that several companies said to be at fault for the accident.

Halliburton and Transocean also issued statements deflecting blame away from themselves, emphasising BP’s role or the quality of their own management processes instead.

Last month, the United States Justice Department announced that it had slapped BP and other companies with a lawsuit seeking “unlimited removal costs and damages,” under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.