Bin Laden’s ex-driver acquitted

October 17, 2012 11:13 pm | Updated October 18, 2016 02:46 pm IST - Washington:

Tuesday was a good day for two high-profile prisoners — facing trial on 9/11-related charges — in the U.S. Cuban prison at Guantanamo Bay at the federal Court of Appeals for the District of Colombia circuit.

The alleged mastermind behind the attacks, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, was permitted to wear camouflage clothing in court as per his wishes, while a former Yemeni driver for Osama bin Laden Salim Hamdan had his terror conviction vacated.

At a pre-trial hearing,a military judge said that Sheikh Mohammed could wear the camouflage outfit which, as per his lawyers’ request, bore the label of a U.S. clothing maker Rothco, which describes itself as “America’s foremost wholesale supplier of military and outdoor products”.

Sheikh Mohammed’s legal team had argued that he considered himself a “prisoner of war and wanted to wear clothing similar to what he wore as a Mujahideen fighter”. The Guantanamo prison commander was said to have previously forbidden it.

The U.S. Court of Appeals, while hearing Hamadan’s case, argued that “the charge against Mr. Hamdan — providing material support for terrorism — was not a recognised international war crime at the time of his actions”. In 2006, the Supreme Court had, in a landmark ruling, struck down Bush Administration’s policy of military commissions.

While admitting that the Military Commissions Act of 2006 enacted by the U.S. Congress after Hamdan’s Supreme Court victory would require the war-crime charge to be pressed against Hamdan, the Court said this mechanism could not apply retroactively.

“Because we read the Military Commissions Act not to retroactively punish new crimes, and because material support for terrorism was not a pre-existing war crime under 10 U.S.C. § 821, Hamdan’s conviction for material support for terrorism cannot stand”.

In 2008, Hamdan was convicted of providing material support to al-Qaeda, by a panel of six military officers, following which he was slapped with a five-and-a-half year jail term. As he had already spent six years in custody at Guantanamo Bay, he was released shortly thereafter.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.