Bald New Zealand killer wins toupee lawsuit

Argues jail authorities breached his rights by seizing the wig he used to disguise himself when fleeing country.

March 16, 2017 09:59 am | Updated 10:02 am IST - WELLINGTON:

Rows of wigs seen in this file photo. Don’t underrate a toupee as the hairpiece may win you a lawsuit, a New Zealand murderer, who was sensitive about his baldness, has proved.

Rows of wigs seen in this file photo. Don’t underrate a toupee as the hairpiece may win you a lawsuit, a New Zealand murderer, who was sensitive about his baldness, has proved.

A convicted murderer and child molester in New Zealand won a lawsuit on Thursday arguing prison authorities breached his rights by confiscating a toupee he used to disguise himself when fleeing the country.

Phillip John Smith fled to Brazil in November 2014 while on temporary release from the Auckland Prison.

At the time, he was wearing a toupee he had been given permission to wear two years earlier “to improve his self-esteem.”

When he was recaptured and returned to New Zealand three weeks later the wig was confiscated and images of Smith’s bald pate were splashed across the media when he appeared in court.

And he felt ‘humiliated’

“I felt totally belittled, degraded and humiliated,” Smith told the High Court earlier this month.

The murder convict was sentenced to life in 1996 for sexually abusing a boy over a three-year period, then tracking down his victim after his family fled to another city.

Smith broke into the family’s house and fatally stabbed the boy’s father as he tried to protect his son.

The 42-year-old told the court the toupee was important to his ongoing rehabilitation as he was extremely sensitive about his baldness.

Judge was on his side

Judge Edwin Wylie accepted Smith’s argument that the Corrections Department failed to consider his rights when it seized the hairpiece.

“I have concluded that Mr. Smith’s fundamental right to freedom of expression was ignored,” he said in a written judgement delivered on Thursday. “An important right has been breached and the breach may be material.”

The judge said freedom of expression could include a physical act, such as wearing a wig, and Smith did not lose his fundamental rights when he became a prisoner.

Mr. Wylie rescinded the prison’s decision to confiscate the toupee but suspended it for two weeks to allow authorities to make a fresh case.

He declined Smith's application for NZ$5,000 ($3,500) in damages.

‘It cannot be used to smuggle’

Mr. Wylie noted that Smith had denied he could smuggle contraband under the hairpiece because the tape that fixed it to his head was transparent.

“He also stated that there were other benefits — namely the protection of his scalp from sun exposure and the prevention of heat loss through his head in winter,” the judge said.

Smith was on the verge of parole when he fled in 2014 but was given an additional 33 months jail time for the Brazil escape.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.