Police on Friday investigated the motive of the anti-U.S. activist they say slashed the U.S. ambassador to South Korea, as questions turned to whether security was neglected.
The attack on Thursday on Mark Lippert, which prompted rival North Korea to gloat about “knife slashes of justice,” left deep gashes on his face and hand and damaged tendons and nerves.
Police searched the offices and house of the suspect, Kim Ki-jong, 55, and seized hundreds of documents, books and computer files. Police are also looking into Kim’s past travels to North Korea seven times between 1999 and 2007. Kim, who has a long history of anti—U.S. and violent protests, said he acted alone. Security for Mr. Lippert was another focus. U.S. ambassadors have security details, but their size largely depends on the threat level.
The U.S. Embassy, citing security reasons, only informed South Korean police of what Mr. Lippert was doing a little before Thursday’s event, and it provided its own security detail for the ambassador, according to a Seoul police officer who spoke on condition of anonymity, citing office rules. The U.S. Embassy directed all questions on security issues to U.S. officials in Washington.
By law, South Korea provides police protection for a U.S. ambassador only when the American Embassy requests it, according to South Korean police. The U.S. Embassy didn’t request security for Lippert, but 29 officers were deployed as a precaution, although all but four were on standby outside the building, the officer said.
Even before the attack on Lippert, Kim was well-known among police and activists as one of a hard-core group of protesters willing to use violence to highlight their causes. He received a three-year suspended sentence in 2010 for throwing a piece of concrete at the Japanese ambassador to Seoul while protesting Japan’s claim to small disputed islands that are occupied by South Korea.
More recently, Kim had been under investigation by Seoul prosecutors after allegedly assaulting at least one public employee at an outdoor pop concert in January.
Officials at Seoul’s Jongno police station said they were aware of Kim’s violent history, but did not consider the possibility that he would show up at the breakfast meeting, despite his ties to the group that hosted it.
When Kim entered the hall where the attack occurred, a police officer asked one of the event organisers whether he should be allowed to enter, Jongno district police Chief Yun Myung-sung told reporters. The organising official answered that Kim could enter because he was associated with an organization that had been invited to the meeting.
A security expert called the police inept.
“There is no excuse for allowing a blacklisted person to enter the venue for an event like this,” said Yu Hyung—chang, a professor at Kyungnam University in Changwon who served in South Korea’s presidential secret service for 20 years until 2000. “If you are going to let him enter, then the very basic thing to do is to have an officer stay close to him at all times.”
Yu said the police, knowing what they did about Kim, should have told the embassy about the danger and provided better security, especially since there has been a recent surge in anti-U.S. demonstrations.
While most South Koreans look at the U.S. presence favorably, America infuriates some leftists because of its role in Korea’s turbulent modern history.
Washington, which backed South Korea during the 1950-53 Korean War against the communist North, still stations 28,500 troops here, and anti-U.S. activists see the annual military drills with Seoul as a major obstacle to their goal of a unified Korea.
“South and North Korea should be reunified,” Kim shouted as he slashed Lippert with a 25-centimeter (10-inch) knife, police and witnesses said.
Lippert became ambassador last October, and is a popular figure. He’s regularly seen walking his basset hound, Grigsby, near his residence, not far from where the attack happened. His wife gave birth here and the couple gave their son a Korean middle name.
