The Libyan opposition forces and government troops, unable to achieve substantive strategic gains, are locked in a string of battles across Libya
The Libyan opposition forces and government troops, unable to achieve substantive strategic gains, are locked in a string of battles across Libya amid growing uncertainty about the scale and direction of air power that Western forces are likely to deploy in the country in the coming hours.
With the threat of a takeover of Benghazi by government forces removed after Western air strikes earlier blew up the regime's tanks and heavy weapons near the city, Ajdabiyah, a strategically located city 160 km from Benghazi, has become the new frontline.
There have been air-strikes on regime targets in Ajdabiyah by Western aircraft on Tuesday but it is unlikely that their impact has been decisive. Despite the bombardment, on Tuesday forces loyal to Libyan strongman Muammar Qadhafi fired their heavy weapons, including the devastating truck mounted multi-barrel rockets, with intensity in the direction of opposition forces, stalling their advance.
Both sides have high stakes over control of Ajdabiyah. For the opposition, a permanent loss of Ajdabiyah would open the door for the regime's rapid advance towards two vital locations — Benghazi and Tobruk. Benghazi is only a 90-minute drive from Ajdabiyah, while another road from the city opens directly into Tobruk, only around 150 km from the Egyptian border. Control by the government forces over Tobruk, a famous battlefield of the World War II era, will cut-off Benghazi, the epicentre of the revolt, from Egypt, a vital opposition supply base.
The pro-Qadhafi forces, prizing their country's oil, are also equally desperate to cement their hold over Ajdabiyah. Once entrenched, the city could well become the regime's springboard for an advance over Libya's oil heartland, with oil cities of Brega and Ras Lanuf not far away.
On Tuesday, the opposition forces appear to have recorded a significant success in the city of Zintan, 106 km south of Tripoli. Al Jazeera is reporting that anti-Qadhafi forces have succeeded in breaking the regime's siege around the city. Heavy fighting has also been reported from Misrata, Libya's third largest city, only 200 km east of Tripoli. However, in a possible setback to the anti-Qadhafi forces, there has been growing opposition across the globe against the possible use of air power that can cause “regime change”, especially after Baab Aziziya, Mr. Qadhafi's residential compound was attacked on Sunday night. There are also fears that “regime change” can be accomplished if Western powers provide coordinated fire power from the air to anti-Qadhafi combatants.
Faced with the mounting protests, the United States has signalled that air attacks in Libya were likely to become less intense. “My sense is that — that unless something unusual or unexpected happens, we may see a decline in the frequency of attacks,” said General Carter Ham during an interaction with the media in Washington.
However, the Baab Aziziya compound in Tripoli appeared to have been attacked for a second time overnight. Western forces also targeted two naval installations just outside the city, apparently to degrade the regime's ability to launch sea-borne attacks, similar to the ones it had undertaken earlier to attack the refinery town of Ras Lanuf.
Keywords: Libyan unrest, US war plane crash, missile, air strikes

























I think and pray that the wind of change blowing across arab world should get to nigeria so that the most populous nation in the world will have a true democracy.
Sad state of affairs; the civilians continue their fight on the ground with no physical assistance from the Arab League. As they are slaughtered by Qadhafi's henchmen the Arab League sits back and watches, condemning actions by the UN forces when they see fit. Maybe the civilians should appeal to Israel for help, they might get more of a real response.
This will be the fate of India if we permit Western powers to intervene in any armed conflicts all over the world.
It seems to me that Obama is not better that Bush. Picking out Sadam on false information of having WMDs and 10 years later hundrsds of thousand of dead and severely injured Americans and Iraqis. Iraqis had electricity, food, jobs before the invasion of a sovereign state before and hundreds of thousands don't have any yet today as a result of the invasion. Knowing the Americans were in Iraq in force, Al Queda decided to move in and now they are spread all over Arabia and Yemen. The supposedly WMDs that Sadam had, had been given to him to attack Iran in a 10 year war 81-91(???)so it was ok to give him WMDs as long as he directed them towards the Iranians. In this battle again against a sovereign nation, and God knows who the leaders of the Rebels, The US have been well known to go in and install someone who is no better that the existing head of Government and they have also been know to leave countries when they get the too many of their troops killed, like in Somalia (black hawk down), Lebanon, Vietnam when US public opposition increases. Let's have no doubt about it they want Ghadafi out - period. One of the rebel leaders is an General who switched sides, what will he be like. Their excuse for overpowering a sovereign nation doesn't wash with me as the same is happening in Bahrain,Yemen and have they forgotten Ivory Coast or for that matter Zimbabwe. Yanks stay home and leave the world alone.
Libya's bombing by the western countries is a big mistake why can't the west leave Africa to solve it own political problems? Please in the eyes of God we are all equal - you may be powerful but you are not more powerful then the creator of the aether.
We, (the U.S.) involves itself/ourselves in a civil war, where in the end, a large percentage of the population of Libya will hate us no matter what the outcome. More should be expected from Nobel Peace Prize Winners.
All world should bycott USA and its allies. And end the imperialism and colonism. I know media has many faces.
Only fools would have expected the allies to stick to a 'no fly' zone.That was just an excuse to get started.A no fly zone to protect (citizens)armed to the teeth?I believe they are called (insurgents) and (terrorists)in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Please Email the Editor