‘Angry Senator’ withdraws filibuster

March 04, 2010 08:52 pm | Updated 09:07 pm IST - Washington

Senator Jim Bunning heads for the weekly caucus lunch on Capitol Hill in Washington on March 2, 2010.

Senator Jim Bunning heads for the weekly caucus lunch on Capitol Hill in Washington on March 2, 2010.

For five harrowing days thousands of unemployed benefit claimants and government employees waiting awaiting pay, one man, Senator Jim Bunning of Kentucky, brought the United States’ federal legislation on a jobs support Bill to a grinding halt.

Widely regarded as the “angry Senator”, Mr. Bunning stalled the enactment of key legislation designed to extend financing for continued unemployment benefits and payments to federal employees and highway projects. Mr. Bunning said he objected to these schemes, costing $10 billion, not being paid for but simply being financed through an already skyrocketing federal deficit.

Due to the refusal of Senator Bunning to support the unanimous consent action required for passing these financing bills, around 2,000 federal workers in the Department of temporarily lost their insurance cover.

The full list of welfare measures left in limbo due to Mr. Bunning’s actions included unemployment compensation, ‘COBRA’ premiums, Medicare physician payments, Medicare therapy caps, surface transportation programmes, flood insurance programmes, retransmission of television broadcasts, federal poverty guidelines, and Small Business Administration loan guarantees.

Senate Republicans were quick to distance themselves from Mr. Bunning’s stance even as they watched Democrats gearing up to gain some political mileage from the episode. Senator Susan Collins was quoted as saying “Senator Bunning's views do not represent a majority of the Republican caucus.” It was important that the American people understood that there was bipartisan support for extending these vital programmes, she emphasised.

Mr. Bunning finally relented on Tuesday evening and dropped his objections after coming under fire from both sides of the partisan divide. A bipartisan vote of 78-19 then extended the financing for these policies and the President signed into law H.R. 4691, the “Temporary Extension Act of 2010,” providing short-term extensions to the concerned authorities.

Mr. Bunning’s suggestion that the scheme could be financed out of unspent funds under the stimulus bill would appear unlikely to be taken up by Congress in the near future.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.