US federal court declines to reinstate Trump’s travel ban

In a brief interaction with reporters after the judgement, Mr. Trump described this as a political decision.

February 10, 2017 08:55 am | Updated November 28, 2021 09:56 pm IST - Washington

An activist holds up a sign in front of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, California.

An activist holds up a sign in front of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, California.

A US federal appeals court has unanimously declined to reinstate Donald Trump’s controversial executive order to temporarily ban refugees and people from seven majority-Muslim nations, prompting a sharp reaction from the President who called it a “political decision”.

The judgement by a three-judge bench is seen as a major setback for the Trump Administration which argued that executive order was a major step to prevent entry of radical Islamic terrorists from entering the country.

Mr. Trump soon reacted to the court order in his tweet.

“SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!” Trump wrote indicating that he is deeply disappointed on the decision of the San Francisco-based Ninth Court of Appeal.

The Trump Administration has reached out to the court asking it to lift the halt on the implementation of its executive order that was ordered by a federal court in Seattle after an appeal filed by the Washington State.

The San Francisco Court had held an oral hearing on the case early this week. The bench included Judges William C Canby Jr, Richard R Clifton, and Michelle T Friedland.

“We hold that the government has not shown a likelihood of success on the merits of its appeal, nor has it shown that failure to enter a stay would cause irreparable injury, and we therefore deny its emergency motion for a stay,” the judges said in an unanimous order.

“Rather than present evidence to explain the need for the Executive Order, the government has taken the position that we must not review its decision at all. We disagree,” they wrote.

“In short, although courts owe considerable deference to the President’s policy determinations with respect to immigration and national security, it is beyond question that the federal judiciary retains the authority to adjudicate constitutional challenges to executive action,” the judges said.

In a brief interaction with reporters after the judgement, Mr. Trump described this as a political decision.

“It’s a political decision, and we’re going to see them in court. This is just a decision that came down, but we’re going to win the case,” Trump was quoted as saying by NBC news.

However, his political opponents and rights activists celebrated the court verdict.

“The Constitution wins,” said Indian-American Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal, who was one of the leading Democratic lawmakers against Mr. Trump’s executive order.

“This is an enormous victory for democracy and for families in our country and around the world. The justices unanimously rejected the idea that they should narrow the temporary restraining order based on geography or scope. They signalled that this executive order will likely be overturned in higher court,” Ms. Jayapal said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.