26/11 case: Lakhvi’s lawyers oppose proposal to set up panel

September 18, 2010 03:46 pm | Updated November 28, 2021 09:20 pm IST - Islamabad

An alleged plotter of Mumbai attacks, Pakistani Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi, center, prays with Syed Salahuddin, right, chief of Hezbul Mujahedeen, or United Jehad Council, at a rally on Saturday, June 28, 2008, in Muzaffarabad, capital of Pakistani Kashmir. Pakistan has detained Zarrar Shah, another alleged mastermind of the Mumbai terrorist attacks, Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani confirmed Wednesday, Dec. 10, 2008, apparently making good on pledges to pursue the perpetrators. (AP Photo/Roshan Mughal)

An alleged plotter of Mumbai attacks, Pakistani Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi, center, prays with Syed Salahuddin, right, chief of Hezbul Mujahedeen, or United Jehad Council, at a rally on Saturday, June 28, 2008, in Muzaffarabad, capital of Pakistani Kashmir. Pakistan has detained Zarrar Shah, another alleged mastermind of the Mumbai terrorist attacks, Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani confirmed Wednesday, Dec. 10, 2008, apparently making good on pledges to pursue the perpetrators. (AP Photo/Roshan Mughal)

Lawyers defending LeT commander Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi and six others charged with involvement in the Mumbai attacks on Saturday opposed the prosecution’s proposal to appoint a commission to visit India to record statements of key witnesses, including Ajmal Kasab.

The defence lawyers told Judge Malik Muhammad Akram Awan of the Rawalpindi-based anti-terrorism court that a “high level of risk” is involved with the proposal to send the commission to India.

The lawyers made it clear that a representative of the defence lawyers would not join the commission due to “security concerns”, including the perceived threat in India to persons defending the Pakistani accused, sources told PTI .

Judge Awan, who is conducting the trial within the heavily guarded Adiala Jail for security reasons, took up several applications filed by the prosecution during Saturday’s hearing in the Mumbai attacks case.

One application sought the formation of a commission to visit India to record the testimony of 24 key witnesses, including the lone surviving attacker Kasab.

The second application sought the court’s permission for recording voice samples of the seven accused.

The defence lawyers opposed both applications, saying they went against the provisions of Pakistani laws. They also described the application for forming a commission to go to India as “premature“.

Judge Awan sought a clarification from the prosecution on whether the Indian government had given permission for the proposed commission to visit India.

He asked the prosecution to provide this information at the next hearing on October 2.

The prosecution had filed another application seeking permission from the court for key Indian witnesses to testify by video-conferencing but this was withdrawn after the judge questioned the need for it in light of the government’s move to form a commission to visit India.

While responding to another application filed by the prosecution for summoning 16 Indian doctors who conducted the post-mortem examination of 166 victims of the Mumbai attacks, the defence lawyers sought autopsy reports of the victims and medico-legal reports on 300 people who were injured.

The judge issued a notice to the prosecution in this regard and asked it to respond at the next hearing. Sources said arguments on the applications filed by the prosecution would be resumed during the next hearing on October 2.

Interior Minister Rehman Malik recently said that the trial of the Pakistani suspects was stalled and it was imperative to form the commission to go to India to record the testimony of key witnesses like Ajmal Kasab, magistrate R.V. Sawant Waghule, who recorded Kasab’s confessional statement, and police officer Ramesh Mahale, who led the probe into the attacks.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.