Congress abstains as Lok Sabha clears Insurance Bill

Modi government will have to rethink strategy for Rajya Sabha

March 05, 2015 12:18 am | Updated November 17, 2021 04:24 am IST - New Delhi

The Congress abstained from voting on Wednesday when the Lok Sabha cleared the long-pending Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill that it had originally brought to Parliament when it was in power. The Bill seeks to raise the FDI cap to 49 per cent.

The Modi government that was depending on the Congress to help it clear the controversial Insurance Bill in the Rajya Sabha will now have to rethink its strategy, as without the Congress’s 67 MPs it will not be able to get the law through.

A senior Congress Lok Sabha member later said the party had abstained as it felt it could not oppose its own Bill while it wished to maintain opposition solidarity — it even supported a CPI(M)-sponsored amendment to the Bill on Wednesday.

Clearly, the Congress is heading to either abstention or opposition to the Bill in the Rajya Sabha. Party spokesperson Abhishek Singhvi, stressing at the official briefing that his party had not done a U-turn, said the party was opposing the Bill because the government had adopted the ordinance route, and the Bill that it (NDA govt) had brought to the House had changed the recommendations of the Select Committee. And another senior Congress Rajya Sabha member told The Hindu on Wednesday that the arrogance of the government had helped forge “opposition unity” and his party was in no mood to break it.

If the Congress opposes the Insurance Bill in the Upper House, it is set for certain defeat; if it abstains, the government will still fall short, unless it is able to breach some of the other parties such as the Samajwadi Party or Bahujan Samaj Party. However, given the Congress’s current mood, it looks most likely that the party will oppose the Bill in the Upper House.

In his speech, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor said the BJP had introduced about “100 unnecessary amendments” and “repackaged” it as the NDA’s Insurance Bill.

“They want to permit Foreign Institutional Investments besides increasing the FDI limit. This combination is troubling. The Foreign Institutional Investment remains an extremely volatile, speculative form of foreign investment. Portfolio investments can be liquidated at very short notice and repatriated immediately,” he stressed.

Justifying the decision to raise the cap from 26 to 49 per cent, Minister of State for Finance Jayant Sinha, who piloted the Bill, said the country needs this as “our insurance penetration is low”.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.