Street vendors oppose eviction in Puducherry

They plan protest march

September 28, 2015 12:00 am | Updated 05:52 am IST - PUDUCHERRY:

Roadside vendors urge the government to implement provisions of the Street Vendors Act 2014 to safeguard their livelihood.— File Photo

Roadside vendors urge the government to implement provisions of the Street Vendors Act 2014 to safeguard their livelihood.— File Photo

Roadside vendors and Sunday Market Traders’ Association, which is affiliated to the Central Indian Trade Union (CITU), here have opposed the eviction drive of the municipality. The members of the association also plan to take out a procession on September 29 to show their protest.

T. Murugan, honorary president of the association, said: “It is gross injustice on the part of the municipality to disturb the poor street vendors, whereas it is not taking any action to evict persons who encroached upon 1600 acres of poramboke land belonging to the municipality along the drainage canal.”

V.G. Nilavazhagan, CITU unit secretary, said the authorities should not remove the roadside vendors in the pretext of beautifying the city. The municipality should give up the move and the police should not harass them.

The street vendors and small trader have also urged the government to implement provisions of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act 2014 that guarantee their livelihood.

Pointing out the features of new Act, Mr. Murugan and Mr. Nilavazhagan said the new law was enacted only to protect the rights of urban street vendors and to regulate street vending activities.

They said a town vending committee should be constituted and it should conduct a survey of all existing street vendors.

Every street vendor should be issued certificate of vending. “No street vendor shall be relocated or evicted by local authority from the place specified in the certificate of vending unless he has been given thirty days’ notice,” they added.

‘The municipality is not taking action to evict those who encroached upon 1,600 acres of poramboke land along drainage canal’

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.