Section 66-A: businessman approaches court

Ravi Srinivasan was booked for defamatory tweets

March 28, 2015 12:00 am | Updated 05:50 am IST - PUDUCHERRY:

Ravi Srinivasan coming out of court along with his lawyer in Puducherry on Friday. - Photo: T.Singaravelou

Ravi Srinivasan coming out of court along with his lawyer in Puducherry on Friday. - Photo: T.Singaravelou

Following Supreme Court order striking down the controversial provision of Section 66-A of Information Technology Act 2008, a city-based businessman, who was perhaps the first ever person booked under the provision for allegedly defamatory tweets, on Friday approached a local court for closure of the case.

On October 30, 2012, Ravi Srinivasan, businessman and a volunteer with India Against Corruption, was arrested — reportedly a first-for-tweets in the country — following a complaint by Congress leader and then Union Finance Minister P. Chidambaram’s son Karti Chidambaram.

Mr. Srinivasan was allegedly woken up in the early hours and dragged out of his house by CB-CID men and informed that he was under arrest for his tweets.

The charge was that some of the tweets from his Twitter account allegedly defamed Mr.Karti and some other tweets reportedly made unseemly references to P. Chidambaram, then Finance Minister. He was produced before a judicial magistrate and released on bail in the evening.

The case has been pending still in the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Puducherry and Mr. Srinivasan has filed a petition in the court for discharging him from the proceeding.

Mr. Srinivasan had contended that the case against him was groundless from the available records/documents and the statements of prosecution.

When the matter came up for hearing arguments on Friday, Mr.Srinivasan appeared and filed another petition through his counsel M.V. Ramachandra Murthy before Chief Judicial Magistrate G.Vijayakumari.

Mr. Ramachandra Murthy said Mr. Srinivasan has been charged for the alleged offence under Section 66-A of IT Act which the Supreme Court had the other day struck down declaring it unconstitutional.

Hence, he prayed that Mr. Srinivasan be discharged from the case and appropriate orders passed to this effect.

The Chief Judicial Magistrate adjourned the matter to April 2 for pronouncing order.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.