Sohrabuddin’s brother wants to withdraw plea against Shah’s discharge in fake encounter case

October 06, 2015 11:36 pm | Updated 11:36 pm IST - MUMBAI:

A special CBI court had discharged Amit  Shah from the Sohrabuddin fake encounter case.

A special CBI court had discharged Amit Shah from the Sohrabuddin fake encounter case.

Sohrabuddin Shaikh’s brother Rubabuddin told the Bombay High Court on Tuesday that he wanted to withdraw his application challenging BJP president Amit Shah’s discharge from the Sohrabuddin Shaikh and Tulsiram Prajapati fake encounter case.

Time to rethink

However, Justice Anuja Prabhudesai gave him two weeks to think over his plea as the court felt that his decision was not “voluntary.”

Rubabuddin filed a petition in the High Court last month challenging the trial court’s decision last year to discharge Mr. Shah. Interestingly, he did not inform his lawyers of his decision to withdraw the petition and told the court that there was a communication gap with his lawyers.

“It is only when I saw him in court did I learn that he filed an affidavit for withdrawal. The court felt that Rubabuddin’s decision to withdraw was not voluntary and gave him time,” his lawyer Vijay Hiremath told The Hindu .

On December 30, 2014, a special CBI court here discharged Mr. Shah on the grounds that the charges were political, and for want of evidence.

Subsequently, the former Rajasthan Home Minister, Gulabchand Kataria; Rajasthan trader Vimal Patni; the former Gujarat Director-General of Police, P.C. Pande; and Additional Director-General of Police Geeta Johri were also discharged.

The Sohrabuddin case was transferred to Mumbai in September 2012. Sohrabuddin, a gangster with alleged links to the terror outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba, was killed by the Gujarat police in a staged shootout on November 25, 2005.

Two days later, his wife Kausar Bi was killed. His aide Tulsiram Prajapati was murdered on December 28, 2006. Shah was a Gujarat minister at the time. As there were links between the Sohrabuddin and Prajapati cases, the Supreme Court clubbed them in 2013.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.