‘Sanjay Dutt’s release as per rules’

July 18, 2017 01:06 am | Updated 01:06 am IST

(FILES) In this photograph taken on May 5, 2013, Indian Bollywood film actor Sanjay Dutt inaugurates the mobile Mammography Screening Bus on behalf of his late mother and Bollywood film actress, the Nargis Dutt Memorial Charitable Trust in Mumbai.   Bollywood star Sanjay Dutt was set to return to jail on May 15, 2013,  to serve the remaining three-and-a-half years of his sentence for possessing illegal weapons, in a case linked to deadly bomb blasts in Mumbai 20 years ago. The hugely popular 53-year-old must surrender to authorities after India's top court dismissed a last-ditch plea earlier this week.   AFP PHOTO/STR/FILES

(FILES) In this photograph taken on May 5, 2013, Indian Bollywood film actor Sanjay Dutt inaugurates the mobile Mammography Screening Bus on behalf of his late mother and Bollywood film actress, the Nargis Dutt Memorial Charitable Trust in Mumbai. Bollywood star Sanjay Dutt was set to return to jail on May 15, 2013, to serve the remaining three-and-a-half years of his sentence for possessing illegal weapons, in a case linked to deadly bomb blasts in Mumbai 20 years ago. The hugely popular 53-year-old must surrender to authorities after India's top court dismissed a last-ditch plea earlier this week. AFP PHOTO/STR/FILES

Mumbai: Defending actor Sanjay Dutt’s early release, the Maharashtra government told the Bombay High Court on Monday that there was no special reduction of sentence granted and his release was as per the rules.

A division bench of Justices R.M. Savant and Sadhana Jadhav was hearing a public interest litigation filed by Pradeep Bhalekar, chairperson of Samajik Karyakarta Saurakhan Samiti, which held that the remission granted to Mr. Dutt is wrong and illegal.

Appearing for the petitioner, advocate Nitin Satpute said, “What is the good behaviour and conduct that has been held as a ground for granting him remission and reducing his sentence? What about all the other convicts especially in petty offences who are rotting in jail?”

The affidavit submitted by the Advocate General Ashutosh Kumbhakoni said that Mr. Dutt’s matter is concerned with the category of prisoners which provides for three days of remission per month for good behaviour, discipline and participation in institutional activities, and four days per month for performing the allotted work in accordance with prescribed standards. Citing the Maharashtra Prisons (Remission System) Rules, 1962, it said the accused is entitled to 114 days of remission a year, and in Mr. Dutt’s case, the total remission earned and sanctioned is 256 days.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.