Residents oppose Shitap’s bail

Relatives of Ghatkopar building collapse victims move HC

September 26, 2017 12:13 am | Updated 12:13 am IST

Rescuers work on the debris after a five-story building collapsed in the Ghatkopar area of Mumbai, India, Tuesday, July 25, 2017. A fire official says 11 people have been rescued and more are feared trapped.(AP Photo/Rafiq Maqbool)

Rescuers work on the debris after a five-story building collapsed in the Ghatkopar area of Mumbai, India, Tuesday, July 25, 2017. A fire official says 11 people have been rescued and more are feared trapped.(AP Photo/Rafiq Maqbool)

Mumbai: Residents of Siddhi Sai apartment, which collapsed in Ghatkopar two months ago, moved the Bombay High Court on Monday, opposing the bail plea filed by the accused, Shiv Sena member Sunil Shitap.

Those who have approached the court include Lalit Thak, who lost his mother, wife and daughter; Mehul Dongre, who lost his parents and one-year-old son; Rajesh Diyora, whose mother, brother and sister-in-law died in the collapse; Paras Ajmera, who lost his wife and daughter; Sinika Khanchandani, whose father, grandmother and brother were victims; and Pritesh Shah, who lost his mother and daughter. Lalchand Ramchandani, Neeraj Gandhi and Darshan Joshi, whose wife, cousin and son, respectively, were injured, and Sadhana Shah and Birendrakumar Singh, who lost their property, are also among those opposing Mr. Shitap’s bail.

Mr. Shitap, who is lodged in Thane Central Prison, has been booked under Sections 304 (II) (culpable homicide not amounting to murder), 336 (act endangering life or personal safety of others) and 338 (causing grievous hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others) of the Indian Penal Code.

The petition filed by advocate Ashish Mehta says Mr. Shitap, his wife and mother had bought three flats on the ground floor and one more on the upper floor of the building and converted their usage from residential to commercial without securing the necessary permissions or consent of the society. In July 2017, he carried out extensive alterations to the premises, removing the load-bearing internal walls and six columns and beams. The remaining load-bearing beams and columns had been tampered with, and the plaster of the columns was also removed.

The victims said Mr. Shitap had installed a new rolling shutter by cutting the wall facing the society’s main gate, and made other major structural changes, which ultimately resulted in the accident.

On August 24, the additional sessions court had rejected his bail plea. A single-judge bench of Justice Revati Mohite-Dere will hear the plea on Tuesday.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.