Civic Budget discussions proceed on expected lines

Opposition alleges repeat of several projects from past years

March 26, 2013 01:28 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 12:13 pm IST - Kozhikode:

The first day of discussions on the City Corporation’s Budget for 2013-14 proceeded on expected lines, with the Opposition repeating its allegation of repetition of promises from the past years and the ruling party blaming the Union and the State governments for lack of funds.

C.P. Musafir Ahmed of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) kicked off the proceedings by suggesting an increase in efficiency of tax collection. He said big projects such as the Cyber Park and the Thantedam park were not mentioned in the Budget. However, he said the multi-level parking lot and the solar streetlights were worthy of emulation by other cities.

K. Sreekumar of the Congress said the current Budget was a copy of the previous year’s, pointing out page numbers from which the contents were repeated without change.

“The fact that the Deputy Mayor had to repeat many of the items from the previous Budget proves that there has not been much progress in many of the projects,” he said.

K. Sathyanathan of the Congress said the civic Budget just purveyed dreams every year, and the Corporation should carry out its own duties before blaming the State government.

“In the golden jubilee year of the Corporation, even the master plan is yet to be prepared. We have been hearing of projects such as the multi-level parking lot for the past many years. But they have remained only on paper,” he said.

Only a handful of councillors brought up issues from their own wards.

K. Devaki of the CPI(M) said the houses near the IT park were in a precarious situation, developing cracks on their walls because of the construction work. She suggested that the Corporation request the State government for compensation to the affected parties. Another suggestion was to route the linkage loans to Kudumbasree groups and payment to home shops through women’s co-operatives.

P. Devarajan of the CPI(M) said a special fund needed to be created to be used during times of natural calamities. He countered the Opposition allegations of water projects being ignored in the Budget, alleging that the Centre was planning to privatise water distribution in the country.

Braziliya Shamsudheen of the Indian National League said she had not yet got the ward fund from the previous Budget.

Sakaria P. Hussein of the Congress demanded the cancellation of the build, operate, transfer contract awarded to a private company for the construction of flats for lower-income groups at Kalluthankadavu.

Jean Moses of the Socialist Janata (Democratic) demanded an amendment to the Budget since it had no projects.

The debate will continue on Tuesday, following which Deputy Mayor P.T. Abdul Latheef will give his reply.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.