No takers for parking lot at Chromepet station

June 10, 2010 02:45 am | Updated November 08, 2016 06:09 pm IST - TAMBARAM:

TAMBARAM 09 JUNE 2010

FOR CITY

CAPTION: The contract period for running the two-wheeler parking lot near Chromepet railway station ended on June 1 and there have been no takers for the tenders called for by Southern Railway.

Photo: A.Muralitharan.

Story by K.Manikandan.

TAMBARAM 09 JUNE 2010 FOR CITY CAPTION: The contract period for running the two-wheeler parking lot near Chromepet railway station ended on June 1 and there have been no takers for the tenders called for by Southern Railway. Photo: A.Muralitharan. Story by K.Manikandan.

There have been no takers for the contract to operate the two-wheeler parking lot near Chromepet railway station.

On Wednesday, hundreds of office-goers and students who use the EMU services left their motorcycles and bicycles at the facility at their own risk.

Enquiries revealed that the Commercial Department of Southern Railway had invited bids about six months ago to award the contract for maintaining the parking lot.

A board installed at the parking lot states that the facility has been temporarily closed down on June 1. Enquiries with Southern Railway revealed that the temporary contract, issued to an individual, expired on June 1. It was extended by a week, by when the existing contract was expected to be renewed or the facility handed over to the highest bidder in the tender.

On Wednesday morning, in the absence of the contractor's men, there was some confusion as owners were worried about leaving their vehicles unattended. Personnel of the Railway Protection Force and Chromepet police station were instructed to maintain a vigil and restore order.

Commuters were visibly upset as parking the two-wheelers would be unsafe. It was a loss of revenue for Southern Railway, as it charges Rs.1.25 lakh from contractors of the parking lot.

On enquiry, Southern Railway officials said they had floated a tender well ahead of the end of the existing contract, but there were no applicants. They had called for bids again and there were no takers the second time too. Steps were being taken to appoint a contractor at the earliest, they added.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.