Monitoring panel not happy with steps taken to check building violations

November 16, 2012 11:50 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 11:43 pm IST - CHENNAI

The High Court-appointed monitoring committee, which met on Friday, directed the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority to study the possibility of constituting a panel of architects to check building violations.

The committee expressed dissatisfaction over the enforcement action taken by CMDA and the Chennai Corporation so far and said “special teams formed for enforcement is not having an effect.”

“Stop work notice is not working. Violation has become the order of the day. Architects of multi-storied buildings and special buildings should be involved in monitoring the construction in every stage till the completion certificate is issued,” said M.G.Devasahayam, monitoring committee member.

The committee also suggested that architects who fail to report building violations should be penalised.

It pointed to the Madras High Court’s decision in 2006 to strike down schemes introduced by the government to regularise unauthorised construction. The court upheld only the scheme announced in 1999. This meant that unauthorised buildings completed before February 28, 1999 alone qualified for regularisation. As a result, about 25,000 applications of the 65,529 submitted for regularisation were rejected at that time.

“Now the whole order and the new guidelines under Section 113-C of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 for the exemption of unauthorised buildings from regulations has changed the goalpost. Now, we need to have more legal clarity,” said Mr.Devasahayam.

“The monitoring committee is a creation of the High Court. How can you liberalise norms without the sanction of the High Court,” said Mr.Devasahayam. Members also questioned the relevance of the monitoring committee, after the State government has decided to condone unauthorised buildings constructed before July 1, 2007, for a fee. CMDA officials said the monitoring committee will continue to play a key role as the guidelines under Section 113-C of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 offered only a “limited solution to the problem of violation.”

They clarified that the guidelines will cover only provisions of FSI, setback requirements and road width of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. Applications for exemption will be rejected if violations in respect of minimum required road width exceeds 20 per cent. Violation in respect of minimum setback spaces around such unauthorised building shall not exceed 50 per cent. FSI shall not exceed 50 per cent of the allowable limit.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.