Employ polio-afflicted person as bus conductor, High Court directs TNSTC

Physically challenged persons cannot be denied government jobs if their deformity will not in any way affect the nature of work to be performed by them, the Madras High Court Bench in Madurai has said.

August 19, 2009 02:24 pm | Updated 02:24 pm IST - MADURAI:

Physically challenged persons cannot be denied government jobs if their deformity will not in any way affect the nature of work to be performed by them, the Madras High Court Bench here has said.

Setting aside an order passed by a single judge, a Division Bench of Justices Chitra Venkataraman and M. Duraiswamy directed the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (TNSTC) to employ a person afflicted with polio as a bus conductor.

P. Senthil Kumar of Dindigul had filed the present writ appeal against the dismissal of a writ petition by a single judge on the ground that the petitioner suffering with 40 per cent disability was not eligible to be employed as a bus conductor.

Reversing the dismissal order, the Division Bench pointed out that a Senior Civil Surgeon of a Government hospital at Dindigul had opined that the deformity in the lower limb of the petitioner would not be a hindrance in working as a conductor.

The judges recalled that another Division Bench of the High Court in the case of P. Mahavishnu Vs. TNSTC (2008) had directed the TNSTC to appoint a person, who suffered from physical deformity on his left hip, as a conductor.

Then, the court had observed that refusing employment to a physically challenged person, whose deformity does not interfere with the functions of a conductor, does not meet the standards of fairness. "As a result of the deformity, his gait, if at all, may become a little inartistic. The petitioner is not appointed as a dance trainer but only as a conductor in a bus," the judgment read.

The court went on to state: "It cannot be disputed that in the present-day grim situation of unemployment, a person’s opportunity to be employed has been equated by the Apex court as his right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution. So by denying employment to the petitioner, virtually, his fundamental right to life is sought to be taken away."

Following this decision and also considering the medical opinion given by a Senior Civil Surgeon in the present case, the Division Bench of Justices Venkataraman and M. Duraiswamy directed the TNSTC to appoint the polio-afflicted appellant as a conductor in its Dindigul division within four weeks.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.