CMRL, Gammon agree for arbitration

Justice A.P. Shah to preside the mediation

April 30, 2016 03:56 pm | Updated 04:04 pm IST - CHENNAI

In 2011, Gammon bagged Rs 1,947-crore contract along with Mosmetrostroy to design and construct seven underground stations for the CMRL. But  Mosmetrostroy abandoned the Metro project midway. — File Photo: G. Krishnaswamy

In 2011, Gammon bagged Rs 1,947-crore contract along with Mosmetrostroy to design and construct seven underground stations for the CMRL. But Mosmetrostroy abandoned the Metro project midway. — File Photo: G. Krishnaswamy

The legal tussle between the Chennai Metro Rail Limited (CMRL) and the Gammon India Limited is likely to end amicably as they have agreed for arbitration before the Madras High Court.

The First Bench of Chief Justice S.K. Kaul and Justice M.M. Sundresh appointed a three-member arbitration committee presided by the Justice A.P. Shah, retired Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court and the former Chairman of the Law Commission.

The decision of the CMRL in July 2015 to terminate the order placed to Gammon due to delay in completion of the tunnelling project after Gammon's joint venture partner Mosmetrostroy, a Russian Company, abandoned the project led to the legal battle as Gammon approached the high court.

In 2011, Gammon bagged Rs 1,947-crore contract along with Mosmetrostroy to design and construct seven underground stations for the CMRL.

In a recent hearing, when the parties agreed for arbitration, the Bench said, “With the positive approach of the senior counsels, the controversy has been resolved and it is agreed that all the parties would go in for arbitration to resolve their disputes.”

Kirti Dave, Charted Engineer, Techno-Legal Consultant based in Mumbai was nominated as a member to the arbitration committee by Gammon. Similarly, CMRL nominated P.V. Amarnadha Prasad, Techno-Legal Expert, Arbitration Consultant and Advocate based in Hyderabad.

The parties also agreed the suggestion made by the court to appoint Justice A.P. Shah as Presiding arbitrator as legal issues are involved in these matters, apart from technical issues.

The Bench then directed to keep alive the six bank guarantees given by Gammon to the tune of Rs. 115 crore during the period of arbitration.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.