Socialist Realism

February 18, 2012 06:56 pm | Updated July 23, 2016 11:29 am IST

Outtakes

Outtakes

What it is…

A doctrine that originated in the Soviet Union during the 1930s, and subsequently taken up by other communist nations, which put forth a set of rigid guidelines for artists to stick to. These rules were furnished in order to further the spirit of socialism among the Soviet people and to cull out any anti-revolutionary activity. Socialist Realism retained a hold on Soviet cinema till the death of Stalin in 1953.

Who its pioneers were...

Soviet leaders had recognised the power of cinema to reach and influence a large audience very early on. Lenin even called it the most important art form. Consequently, cinema was used as a vehicle to advertise and promote the party line. To speak of pioneers in such a context becomes tricky because Socialist Realism tended to suppress individual authorship — formal and textual — in favour of pre-determined answers.

Why it is important...

Although it had its takers in certain parts of the world during its time, to a large extent, Socialist Realism, in its original form, has now ceased to exist except in certain authoritarian states. With the fall of the Soviet Union and the widespread disillusionment with its ideology, art works that present an Utopian vision of communism are seen with a skeptical eye.

Where to find it...

Chapaev (1934), perhaps the most famous of Socialist Realist films (though much less propagandistic), tells the tale of commander Vasily Chapayev, who rises from a simple bumpkin to a legendary Russian war hero during the course of the film. Incurably nationalistic, the film is shot and edited with little sense of adventure, unlike its contemporaries.

How it is characterised

Objectives

Unlike Neorealism, Socialist Realism provided authors and filmmakers a small group of themes and arcs to work with. The industrial worker was glorified for his productivity; the individual had to willingly and happily subordinate himself to the collective; aristocrats and Capitalists had to be portrayed in a bad light; women had to be shown as key elements of the revolution; and, eventually, all narrative problems needed to be resolved by socialist means.

Style

Socialist Realism was notorious for suppressing technical innovation in favour of simplicity and didacticism. Any style that produced ambiguity of meaning was rejected. For this reason, the then-famous montage techniques had to make way for simpler, more established, way of illustration so that the intended, propagandist message did not go above the heads of audience. The musical score and cinematography, likewise, were designed to be uplifting.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.