With the first cameras installed at a Corporation school, stakeholders have mixed views
As S. Kamakshi and her friends play kho kho on the playground of the Chennai Higher Secondary School in Thiruvanmiyur, a distant eye is systematically watching them, an eye that does not blink, and does not forget. The all-pervasive CCTV camera here has been installed as part of a pilot project. For now, students are enamoured of this new addition, because they are now equivalent to ‘private schools’ in terms of availability of technology.
According to A.P. Subramanian, assistant headmaster, the school has four cameras, one monitoring the main gate, one the playground, one the record room and one the corridor in the main block. The cameras , which have been in place for close to 45 days, according to him, are a solution to many perils, he says. Late-comers and ‘trouble-makers’ can be watched, the entry of outsiders into the school can be curbed, and in case of quarrels, the footage can be used as evidence.
Headmistress K.B. Gomathi says that since only two night watchmen, hired on a contract basis, patrol their large campus, the cameras help greatly from a safety perspective. Four more cameras, she says, will be installed. Its role in enforcing discipline is only an added advantage.
When asked about how they felt about the newly-installed cameras, students clinically listed things they could no longer do — those opting for mid-day meals would not be able to waste the food and bury it in the playground, they could not leave school indiscriminately, they would no longer be able to indulge in petty fights, but there would also be no fear of bicycles getting stolen. Beyond all that though, N. Shalini and her friends say that if they fell down clumsily while playing on the field, they would be conscious of the fact that their headmaster would be watching them.
Jeyapriya R., a teacher at the school, however, poses a more fundamental question. For how long can students be disciplined by a camera? Discipline, she says, has to come from within. “But when students indulge in a petty quarrel, and parents come asking, we have the evidence to show them,,” she adds.
What prompts children to comply with a roving camera but not a teacher? “When we’re playing pranks in the ground, there is a fair chance that no teacher would have seen us. But, now we cannot take a chance,” M. Sudhan says.
Private schools in the city which have been using CCTV cameras for a few years now, and are all too familiar with its workings. Ajeeth Prasath Jain, senior principal, Bhavan’s Rajaji Vidyashram, says that his school’s 80 cameras were installed five years ago and have been helpful in keeping a watch on the children. “We have abstained from installing cameras in classrooms because we do not want to rob the freedom of the student and the teacher. They have been installed only in the movement areas and the labs,” he says.
Educationist S.S. Rajagopalan however says, “This system is based on the mistaken assumption that children will behave only when watched,” he says. Children, he adds, are bound to misbehave in a controlled atmosphere, and must be given the freedom to be children.
Keywords: CCTV debate, surveillance in schools







I would like to say that the school I work in has cameras positioned at many points. These are the ways in which it helps:
1.If anyone gets into mischief, they can be identified by the footage. Monitoring children is very important esp to prevent bullying and aggressive behaviour which teachers cannot do at all times of the day
2. Security is monitored as the school can watch who enters and leaves the school
3. Library book handling, laboratory work and canteen food serving is more orderly due to the presence of the surveillance camera.
BTW, what is wrong with using technology for a purpose that gives more to gain than lose?
They are students -- not some criminals. Sad that school is being turned
into prison. And there is also the possibility that the privacy of
children, especially that of girl students may be violated.
Why CCTV only on students, there are teachers who molest their students.How abt CCTV on their teachers.
I think using CCTV is fine considering the benefits it has to offer- Safty, discipline like latecomers etc. But at the same time it should not be over-relied. Good that classrooms are spared from installing CCTV (Overreliance on CCTV may result in mechannical relation-ship; will evaporate the emotional, fun/humor, cultural support from education).
Student-teacher interaction should be free. CCTV should not completely replace existing checks and apraisal mechanisms.
In last CCTV should not be used as a threat but should be used to aid the education and make the schools a better place.
The issue of using CCTVs in schools need elaborate sociological research
for the technology is waiting to occupy every available space in our
everyday life.
Why can't the educational gaurdians leave the children to be children. This behaviour by the school seems autocratic and authoritarian. Such a sad state that the current education enviroment is evolving. It will ultimately take the self-confidence, self-reliant and innovative mind from these children and replace fear, inconsistency and submissive nature. Reminds me of Pink Floyd's 'Another brick on the wall'.
School is a place where children should learn ethics and morals. By installing these CCTV and monitoring their acts will only cause trauma.
We already put children under constant stress in classrooms by teaching lessons,home from parents, tuitons etc. and play ground are the places where children can be free playing pranks,chat,fight etc. This is also important aspects a child should learn to cope up in life.By installing CCTV you stop them.
CCTV should be installed in jails, traffic signals, cycle stands, sensitive places etc. but not in schools.
There is plenty of history in the US to show that constant monitoring - example
CCTV or metal detectors in schools create a mindset of irresponsibility among
children and the adults they grow up into. We can look forward to school and theatre
shootings in India too with all these devices being used so widely.
CCTV cameras around the perimeter of the school is good. It keeps away anti-social elements.
CCTV cameras in areas where children play and socialise is not good. The CCTV operator can misuse it to zoom in on girls and they can be sexually exploited without their knowledge. Images of girls or lady teachers can be transmitted through mobiles or circulated through emails without permission.
What controls are in place to prevent mis-use of the CCTV cameras?
Milton Matthews
Redcliffe
Western Australia
There is a role for CCTV cameras beyond monitoring childrens' behavior
in playgrounds. In a small number of both private and public schools
in the USA an experiment is currently underway to film classes and to
make this available online for parents to see how their wards have
been doing in class. In the case of children who need help in keeping
up with their classwork, this can prove invaluable. There are also
universities and professional schools (Chicago's John Marshall Law
School immediately comes to mind) which film all classes, and make the
videos available to students who may have missed a class or two. While
there are privacy issues that do need to be addressed, there are also
advantages that could help parents help their wards if the
implementation of this system is done right. Perhaps, this is one
place where legal experts and educationists might work together to
come up with a solution that is beneficial to students.
It is just another symptom of this society moving towards "manufacturing" ideal
citizens by controlling their environment artificially. A green peace activist would
see this similar to the creation of Genetically Modified seeds. I bet more parents
will be appreciating this initiative, stating discipline as a reason.
Ironically, we will be celebrating our freedom tomorrow, distributing sweets to
these children who are yet to attain their freedom. The people who were born
pre-independence would never appreciate this, unfortunately most of them are
dead. Today's elder generation, who never experienced the pre-1947 days, think
that they are more powerful than the kids and they can craft their future in the way
they want.
I am not one of them. And I am not going to send my kid to such school. I am not
going to send to the school at all, if all the schools are going to have CCTVs.
Why do people get bothered by CCTV if they aren't doing anything illegal
or when it is not kept in their bathroom or bedroom? Why don't they
realize that surveillance is for their safety too. Nobody needs to be
consciously aware of the presence of a CCTV and people are not expected
to smile or act in front of a camera. Just keep doing your work and no
harm is being done.
An absolutely reprehensible idea. If it is such a good idea to monitor children's behaviour by keeping them under surveillance, and by extension, assume it will modify their behaviour for the better, then my question to the proponents would be "should I install CCTV at home too?"
A Camera does not discriminate between teachers and students. Are teachers comfortable being under surveillance?
As a parent, I would definitely not send my child to any school that uses CCTV. This practice must be discontinued forthwith.
Please Email the Editor