State tells HC why polls to BBMP can’t be held

Civic body may be split; court reserves verdict on plea for holding polls

March 18, 2015 12:00 am | Updated April 02, 2016 10:36 am IST - Bengaluru:

BENGALURU - 10.03.2015 : The Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP), head office, in Bengaluru on March 10, 2015.    Photo: K. Murali Kumar.

BENGALURU - 10.03.2015 : The Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP), head office, in Bengaluru on March 10, 2015. Photo: K. Murali Kumar.

The BBMP itself may not exist for holding elections for the next term of its council, and it will be replaced by two or three new city corporations.

This was the reason cited by State Advocate-General Ravivarma Kumar to the HC for not carrying out the constitutionally mandated responsibility of delimitation of wards as per the 2011 census and fixing reservation of wards for enabling the State Election Commission (SEC) to hold polls to the BBMP’s council, whose term expires on April 21. The submissions were made before Justice B.V. Nagarathna, who is hearing petitions filed by C.K. Ramamurthy and a few other councillors seeking a direction to hold elections before April 21.

Though the A-G admitted that holding elections before the expiry of the council’s term is the mandate of the Constitution as well as the apex court’s directions, he said that the government would decide before April first week on restructuring the BBMP.

Pointing out that a committee is expected to give its suggestions on restructuring, Mr. Kumar said that the government would decide on restructuring even in the absence of report.

If the government decided to continue with the BBMP in its present form, the process of delimitation and reservation of wards would be carried out within three months, the A-G said.

Meanwhile, K.N. Phanindra, counsel for SEC, said that it could not proceed beyond a certain point in the absence of delimitation and reservation of wards despite writing to the government in this regard several times since June 2003. However, he admitted lapses when the court questioned the SEC for not approaching the HC, as per the apex court’s direction.

Though Justice Nagarathna reserved her verdict, the A-G said that he would submit in a sealed cover some deliberations of the government on BBMP restructuring for the court’s perusal on Wednesday.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.