‘Sharief and others can deposit Rs. 66 cr. to revive Amanath Bank’

January 24, 2015 12:00 am | Updated 12:04 pm IST - Bengaluru:

BANGALORE, 11/12/2007: A view of Karnataka High Court in Bangalore.
Photo: V. Sreenivasa Murthy 11-12-2007

BANGALORE, 11/12/2007: A view of Karnataka High Court in Bangalore. Photo: V. Sreenivasa Murthy 11-12-2007

The High Court of Karnataka on Friday said former Union Minister C.K. Jaffer Sharief and others are at liberty to deposit Rs. 66 crore with their respective accounts in Amanath Cooperative Bank (ACB) as part of their attempt to revive the loss-making bank and save it from being merged with the Canara Bank.

Justice Ram Mohan Reddy passed the order on an application filed by Mr. Sharief and others seeking the court’s permission to deposit the amount to show their bona fide over their claim of organising funds for reviving the bank and to prevent its merger.

The application was filed during the hearing of petitions related to, for and against the merger of the ACB with the Canara Bank as well as the petition filed by Mr. Sharief and others seeking a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the affairs of the ACB.

Meanwhile, the counsel for the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) told the court that its policy on merger did not permit it to give a go-ahead for Canara Bank to absorb the losses that ACB has already incurred.

The Canara Bank’s board of directors decided against the initial merger proposal when the audit report indicated that ACB’s depositors will have to lose 32 per cent of their deposit amount as against the initial estimate of 18 per cent loss if the merger has to be financially viable as per the RBI’s norm.

Hardship Committee

When it was pointed out that depositors are facing problem as the RBI had imposed restriction on withdrawal of money from accounts, the RBI counsel said that in case of exigencies, accountholders can file a petition before the Hardship Committee of the RBI for releasing some amount and that some depositors had already availed this facility.

While asking all the parties to resolve the issue, the Court adjourned further hearing to February 20.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.