No need to shift Ambedkar’s statue as work is completed, claims State

February 14, 2013 09:25 am | Updated November 16, 2021 10:27 pm IST - Bangalore:

The government submitted to the court that cost escalation was not due to the statue but due to use of advance blasting technology for preventing damage of heritage buildings.

The government submitted to the court that cost escalation was not due to the statue but due to use of advance blasting technology for preventing damage of heritage buildings.

In a new twist to the row over shifting of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s statue located in front of Vidhana Soudha, the State government on Wednesday claimed before the Karnataka High Court that “there is no need to shift the statue temporarily as work on Metro that may have caused danger to the statue at the spot is completed.”

A submission in this regard was made before a Division Bench comprising acting Chief Justice K. Sreedhar Rao and Justice S. Abdul Nazeer during the hearing on pleas for and against shifting of the statue.

Contrary to the statement of Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited that the cost of the project could go up as high as Rs.100 crore to work without shifting the statue, Additional Advocate-General (AAG) Sajan Poovayya submitted to the court that cost escalation was not due to the statue but due to use of advanced blasting technology for preventing damage to heritage buildings like the High Court and Vidhana Soudha.

Admitting that the State has its own “socio-political equations” due to sensitivity over the issue, Mr. Poovayya, however, claimed that the decision against shifting and to lift the statue from its pedestal was “not a political decision” but a “technical one as a precautionary measure.”

However, the documents produced before the court indicate that though the Government in 2009 ordered for shifting all the three statues [of Jawaharlal Nehru, Subhash Chandra Bose and Dr. Ambedkar], the Social Welfare Minister intervened and put on hold the decision to shift following pleas by various organisations against shifting of Dr. Ambedkar’s statue.

Meanwhile, the Bench asked the AAG whether it was not discriminatory to shift only two statues leaving behind the third one and also keeping the other two statues on pedestal in a rose garden.

However, Mr. Poovayya said that there was no discrimination as it was due to circumstances while pointing out that the situation that existed in 2009 for shifting statues no more existed now.

The Bench adjourned further hearing by asking both the State and BMRCL to file affidavits by Monday with regard to safety of the statue as well as their desirability of relocating the statue.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.