Don’t mock mythical imagination by calling it science, says Karnad

January 11, 2015 12:00 am | Updated 05:35 am IST - Bengaluru:

Karnataka : Bengaluru  10/01/2015 Jnanpith awardees Girish Karnad, writer K Maralusiddappa and CPIM leader Surendra rao take part in discussion about P K Film organized by CPI(M) at Townhall in Bengaluru on Saturday. Photo Sudhakara Jain.

Karnataka : Bengaluru 10/01/2015 Jnanpith awardees Girish Karnad, writer K Maralusiddappa and CPIM leader Surendra rao take part in discussion about P K Film organized by CPI(M) at Townhall in Bengaluru on Saturday. Photo Sudhakara Jain.

To pick out details and characters from Indian mythology to argue that they are proof of scientific advance in ancient times is “insulting our own imagination”, said Jnanpith Award-winning writer Girish Karnad here on Saturday.

Making an oblique reference to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who linked medical science to mythology recently by stating that the creation of Ganesha is proof of the existence of plastic surgeons thousands of years ago, Mr. Karnad said such claims amounted to denying and falsifying the “mythical imagination and symbolism” of our ancient writers. Mythologies across the world were rich in such symbolisms, he added.

At a discussion organised by the Communist Party of India (Marxist), he said claims on 2,000-year-old texts providing answers to all present-day problems amounted to “freezing” ourselves in a historical past. He recalled that Gandhiji, who revered the Bhagavad Gita , said that only 33 shlokas in it were relevant to him. “We should pick what is relevant to us from our past and discard the rest,” he said.

On the Hindi film PK around which the discussion was organised, Mr. Karnad said the Rajkumar Hirani production showed a remarkable “rationalist courage”. Writer K. Marulasiddappa said the common thread between the terrorist attack on the office of the French satirical journal and protests against PK was the “death of a sense of humour” among fundamentalist groups of all hues. PK had to be viewed as comedy with a comment on organised religion and not as a polemic on religion, he said. Mr. Marulasiddappa added that humour and freedom of expression were two important markers of a healthy democracy that need to be preserved.

Humour and freedom of expression are two important markers of a healthy democracy, says Marulasiddappa

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.