‘Don’t allow illegal use of residential buildings for commercial activities’

In a PIL, group of citizens seek compulsory inspection of property before granting sanction for plan

November 12, 2015 12:00 am | Updated 05:30 am IST - Bengaluru:

BANGALORE, 11/12/2007: A view of Karnataka High Court in Bangalore.
Photo: V. Sreenivasa Murthy 11-12-2007

BANGALORE, 11/12/2007: A view of Karnataka High Court in Bangalore. Photo: V. Sreenivasa Murthy 11-12-2007

The Karnataka High Court has directed the State government and civic agencies to ensure that building bye-laws are strictly complied with and residential accommodation is not used for commercial purposes without obtaining proper sanction.

A Division Bench comprising acting Chief Justice Subhro Kamal Mukherjee and Justice B.V. Nagarathna issued the directions in relation to two separate PIL petitions, one filed by a residents’ welfare group and another by a group of concerned citizens, complaining about illegalities in construction of private multi-storey buildings and illegal use of residential buildings for commercial purposes.

In its petition, Rajmahal Vilas II Welfare Society, while complaining of illegal use of residential buildings for commercial purposes in their locality, had sought directions for the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) and the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) to conduct a survey of the area for identifying such buildings and for taking action for using them only for residential purpose.

The Bench disposed of this petition by directing authorities to “strictly implement the provisions of the municipal laws, so that no residential accommodation is utilised for commercial purpose without obtaining proper sanction”.

In another PIL, a group of citizens had sought compulsory inspection of property before granting sanction for plan, particularly multi-storey structures, to ascertain whether the existing infrastructure is sufficient to accommodate such structures, and for a detailed guidelines for the process of plan sanction.

As the counsel for civic agencies and the State admitted that there can be no two opinions that building bye-laws must be strictly complied with, the Bench disposed of the petition while directing authorities “to implement the building bye-laws strictly, in accordance with law”.

A Division Bench issued the directions in relation to two PIL petitions complaining about the issue

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.