Did site storm blow Bannurmath's chances?

January 25, 2012 12:13 pm | Updated October 18, 2016 02:48 pm IST - BANGALORE:

Union Minister for Law and Justices H.R.Bradwaj in Hyderabad on Saturday. Photo: G. Krishnaswamy

Union Minister for Law and Justices H.R.Bradwaj in Hyderabad on Saturday. Photo: G. Krishnaswamy

Governor H.R. Bhardwaj on Sunday said that there are “reasons other than owning a judicial layout plot” for rejecting S.R. Bannurmath's nomination as Lokayukta, and that he was withholding those reasons to “protect the dignity” of the former High Court judge.

But a letter by him to the Chief Minister makes it clear that it was this controversy that prevented him from appointing Mr. Bannurmath to the post.

The letter (a copy is with The Hindu ) dated November 15, 2011 to the Chief Minister states: “…the controversies surrounding him [Justice Bannurmath] are already in the public domain. It is not in the interest of the State or in the interest of preserving the integrity of the institution of Karnataka Lokayukta to appoint the person around whom there are already controversies in the public domain. In this regard, I would not share your perception that the allegations that were made against the nominee of the Government are vague and reckless.

The details narrated by the entire mainstream media do not suggest that the allegations are vague and reckless. I would consider that the media has acted in a very responsible way.”

The inconsistencies between Sunday's statement and this letter gain significance in the light of the appointment of the former High Court judge Chandrashekaraiah as Upalokayukta. Mr. Bhardwaj made the statement on the sidelines of Mr. Chandrashekaraiah's swearing-in ceremony when reporters pointed out that just like Mr. Bannurmath, Mr. Chandrashekaraiah too had benefited from a site allotted by the Karnataka State Judicial Department Employees House Building Cooperative Society.

In his letter, Mr. Bhardwaj also pointed out that, unlike in the case of the former Lokayukta Shivaraj V. Patil, the controversial allotment to Mr. Bannurmath made headlines even before his name was formally proposed by the Government.

“So far there has been no attempt [by the Government] to substantively meet these allegations that came into the public domain and to clear the air about the controversies surrounding the nominee. In such a scenario, we would be undermining the importance of the institution of the Lokayukta and we will be failing in our duty if we are not able to find a person free from such controversies. A set of press reports relating to the controversy surrounding the appointment of Shri S.R. Bannurmath are enclosed,” the letter stated.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.