Concern over govt. move to form expert panel

Experts argue that such committees have not worked in the past

June 04, 2018 12:02 am | Updated 12:02 am IST - Bengaluru

 Chief Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy met Infosys co-founder N.R. Narayana Murthy recently in Bengaluru.

Chief Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy met Infosys co-founder N.R. Narayana Murthy recently in Bengaluru.

Chief Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy’s move to form an expert committee, led by Infosys co-founder N.R. Narayana Murthy, to guide his government’s policy on Bengaluru has its fair share of critics given that similar earlier initiatives were not successful.

“Such expert committees offset the city’s civic body and Bengaluru Metropolitan Planning Committee which are tasked with planning for the city,” said N.S. Mukunda, founder, Citizen Action Forum (CAF).

The Environment Support Group (ESG) and CAF are planning to challenging the setting up of such committees in court on the grounds that they are “extra-constitutional” and opposed to the spirit of the 74th amendment of the Constitution.

In 2014, the High Court of Karnataka had stayed the formation of a similar Bengaluru Vision Group (BVG) when activist C.N. Kumar questioned it on the ground that the Bengaluru Metropolitan Planning Committee was yet to be constituted. However, the court vacated the stay in 2015 after BMPC was notified, leading to the BVG being formed in 2016.

BVG was also led by industry captains, Mr. Murthy and Wipro chairman Azim Premji, and it had only one meeting and was later not pursued following public outcry.

“There can be committees which can make recommendations, but have to be eventually subservient to BMPC, a constitutionally mandated committee. Let us see how the committee is formed,” said Mr. Kumar.

However past experience from such committees, BATF during 1999-2004, AbiDE from 2010-2013, BVG in 2016, show that these are skewed towards industry leaders and the elite of the city and often end up running roughshod over both executive and political representatives, argues Kshitij Urs, People’s Campaign for Right to Water (PCRW).

“TenderSURE project was a classic example of subversion of the due process. The chief secretary at the time had issued an order that BBMP officials cannot intervene in the project, when BBMP was funding the project,” said Mr. Urs.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.