BMTF’s powers are intact, State government tells High Court

‘February GO was to remove overlapping of jurisdiction’

July 23, 2013 09:28 am | Updated November 17, 2021 04:15 am IST - Bangalore

The powers of the Bangalore Metropolitan Task Force (BMTF) has not been taken away: the task force can register a case and proceed with the investigation against any person, including government servants under the specific special laws, the State government on Monday clarified to the Karnataka High Court.

The government termed as “ill-founded” the allegations made in a public interest litigation (PIL) petition, filed by H. Pramod and others, that the BMTF’s powers were withdrawn through a Government Order (GO) on February 2, 2013.

The PIL claimed that the powers were “withdrawn” after the BMTF started registering cases against some top bureaucrats, the then Mayor and some prominent Ministers in the previous BJP government.

Special acts

“The BMTF can register a case and proceed with investigation of the case if the facts contained in the complaint disclose the offences under the special acts with or without those relevant under the Indian penal Code (IPC) and the Karnataka Police Act,” the government statement said.

However, the State made it clear that “if the complaint discloses commission of the alleged offences only under the IPC or Karnataka Police Act, then it will not be competent on the part of the BMTF to proceed with the investigation in the light of the High Court’s 1997 judgment in Dr. S.M. Kalligudd and others vs. the State of Karnataka.”

The provisions

The government said the BMTF could exercise its power under the following special laws: the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976; the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964; the Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976; the BWSSB Act, 1964; the Karnataka Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1973; the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964; the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961; the BMRDA Act, 1985; and the Karnataka SC/ST (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978.

Conscious effort

It said the GO of February 2013 was a conscious effort on the part of the State government to remove the anomalies of overlapping of jurisdiction and to protect the action of the BMTF from being questioned (in courts) for want of express authority under the law.

Adjourned

The hearing on the PIL petition, which came up before a Division Bench comprising Chief Justice D.H. Waghela and Justice A.S. Bopanna, has been adjourned to July 23.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.