Sudheeran calls for Rohatgi’s resignation

Writes to Attorney General, says advice to State on sale of liquor questionable

March 19, 2017 10:37 pm | Updated 10:37 pm IST - Thiruvananthapuram

Kochi, Kerala, 24/11/14. V. M. Sudheeran, is the President of the Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee, former Speaker of Kerala Legislative Assembly and Health Minister, is an active social and political leader in Kerala.  Photo;H.Vibhu.

Kochi, Kerala, 24/11/14. V. M. Sudheeran, is the President of the Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee, former Speaker of Kerala Legislative Assembly and Health Minister, is an active social and political leader in Kerala. Photo;H.Vibhu.

Former Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee (KPCC) president V.M. Sudheeran has demanded Attorney General of India Mukul Rohatgi’s resignation in view his advice to the State government on the Supreme Court verdict against sale of liquor along national and State highways and his appearance in an earlier case in favour of a bar hotel owner who challenged the liquor policy of the previous UDF government.

Mr. Sudheeran wrote to Mr. Rohatgi on Sunday that the Supreme Court verdict had clearly prohibited the sale of liquor along the national and State highways, including bar hotels and beer-wine parlours, which were places where liquor was sold. The judgment had even prevented signage about the availability of liquor.

Many States had already implemented it in its true spirit. But the Kerala government, on the basis of the Attorney General’s advice, had taken a contumacious stand declaring that the court verdict did not apply to bar hotels and beer-wine parlours. According to the State government, they had obtained an advice from Mr. Rohatgi that only retail liquor outlets need be closed.

Earlier case

Mr. Sudheeran recalled in his letter Mr. Rohatgi’s action of appearing for a bar hotel owner in the High Court case against the UDF government’s liquor policy. He said that Mr. Rohatgi, as the Attorney General of India, should not have appeared for a bar hotel owner to challenge the policy of a State government. Now, he had given an advice to the government to flout the Supreme Court judgment.

“There is every reason to believe that you have given such an advice which is plainly untenable in the light of the clear text of the judgment only to help a few bar hotel owners in the State,” Mr. Sudheeran said in his letter.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.