Beedi workers' federation opposes withdrawal of scholarship to children

Fund for it is raised through a welfare cess levied on the beedi producers

January 27, 2012 12:02 pm | Updated October 18, 2016 02:17 pm IST - MANGALORE:

The All India Beedi Workers' Federation has issued a statement “strongly opposing” the Centre's decision to withdraw the scholarship given to children of beedi workers studying between class one and eight.

In a statement, Centre of Indian Trade Unions-affiliated federation national president B. Madhava said the children of beedi workers who were studying between class one and eight should be provided scholarship. A recent circular issued by the Centre had removed children studying between classes one and eight from the list of beneficiaries of the scholarships.

Mr. Madhava told The Hindu on Thursday that when he asked the Commissioner for Beedi Workers Welfare Fund the reason for this circular, he was told that it had been done because the Right to Education Act would make education for children up to class eight free and compulsory.

However, Mr. Madhava said the Government should not withdraw the scholarship for two reasons. First, it was a welfare fund raised through a welfare cess levied on beedi producers. Therefore, it was a welfare measure that benefitted the beedi workers directly from the manufacturers while the funds were only routed through the Government. “The Government is not spending a single paisa (on the scholarship),” Mr. Madhava said.

Second, although education was made free and compulsory under the RTE, there were other costs to education such as transportation and books which were not provided by the Government, he said.

Mr. Madhava said children who did not complete their education up to class eight would not make it to classes IX and above.

Mr. Madhava said the Beedi Workers Welfare Fund Act of 1976 and the rules framed under it had made it possible for lakhs of beedi workers to send their children to school. Had it not been for this scholarship, lakhs of children would have been child labourers, he said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.