Thin security on HC premises

Court officials convert a police outpost into a PWD office

May 23, 2010 07:48 pm | Updated 07:48 pm IST - MADURAI

IRONY:A view of the police outpost, which was converted into a PWD office on the High Court Bench premises in the city. Photo: K. Ganesan

IRONY:A view of the police outpost, which was converted into a PWD office on the High Court Bench premises in the city. Photo: K. Ganesan

The Madras High Court Bench premises here was once touted be one of the most highly fortified campus in the southern districts. But the court complex lost its sheen ever since the clash between the lawyers and police in Chennai on February 19 last year and it is now guarded only by unarmed police personnel who do not even carry a baton with them.

To add to the irony, even a police outpost near the main entrance to the High Court Bench has been converted into an office for the Public Works Department. As of now, more than 70 personnel from the Tamil Nadu Special Police Battalion were guarding the campus. Of them, only sentries in the judges' bungalows, behind the court buildings, were armed with guns. Others remained unarmed.

The present state of security cover in the court campus was in stark contrast to plans chalked out before the February 19 clash. Then, a committee of High Court judges was constituted to beef up the safety measures and it was decided to subject every other person entering the court buildings to a thorough screening with the help of metal detectors and also to erect huge towers in the campus for aerial surveillance.

On January 22, 2009, the Inspector General of Police (south zone) S.S. Krishnamoorthy, who was then the Deputy Inspector General of Police (Madurai range), inspected the Bench premises along with the Superintendent of Police M. Manohar. The two officials studied the entire topography of the court campus spread over 106 acres, including a water body.

The visit was necessitated due to a public interest litigation petition filed by a lawyer seeking a direction to the police to safeguard the Bench premises from falling victim to terrorist attacks similar to the one that took place in Mumbai. Passing interim orders in the case, a Division Bench on January 5 directed the State Government to submit the contingency plans, if any, drawn up to protect the court campus.

Claiming that the Bench lacked sufficient security due to free access provided to every other person, the PIL petitioner had feared that it might prove dangerous for hundreds of people visiting the court. Hence, the two top police officials mulled over the possibility of erecting watch towers on the four corners of the campus and also took a rough estimate of the number police personnel required for the job.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.