Introduced by the British, the holiday system still in vogue

Come May, almost all schools will close for the vacation. So will the Madras High Court Bench here.

The judicial institution continues to follow the colonial practice, despite criticism from several quarters.

Much has changed since the British left the country, yet certain practices, such as having summer vacations introduced by them, continue to be in vogue.

In 2008, the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Law and Justice, headed by E.M. Sudarsana Natchiappan, in its 28th report tabled in Parliament, stated that “the system of vacations is a colonial legacy that has no relevance today.”

The report went on to say: “Given the huge pendency of cases at various levels, including at the Supreme Court, vacation is a privilege that the judicial system could hardly afford.”

It recommended that long court vacations were better done away with.

In 2009, the Law Commission of India chaired by Justice AR. Lakshmanan, wrote in its report to the Union Law Ministry recommending an increase in the number of working days for judges in order to clear huge pendency of cases at all levels of the judicial hierarchy.

“Of late, there has been a general erosion of work culture throughout the country. Government servants avoid discharging their duties and responsibilities. The judiciary has also been affected by this evil. It is high time that all the judges… devote full time to judicial work and should not be under any misconception that they are Lords or above society.

“Though this feeling must come from within, yet some guidelines are necessary,” the report stated.

A similar view was expressed recently by former Supreme Court Judge A.K. Ganguly who had also served as the Chief Justice of Madras High Court and presided over court proceedings on the Madurai Bench.

In a recent interview, Justice Ganguly, not a supporter of court holidays, had gone to the extent of making a fervent appeal to various courts, where he had worked, to desist from declaring a holiday when he dies.

On the other hand, batting in favour of the vacation system, M. Thirunavukarasu, president of Madurai Bench High Court Advocates Association, says that judges as well as lawyers do require a break in view of the enormous physical and mental strain undergone by them through the year.

“Earlier, the High Court was closed for the entire month of May as well as the first two weeks of June. Now they have cut down the number of days and begun reopening the courts in the first week of June. I think this reduction in the number of holidays is not right.

“The first two weeks of June are crucial for lawyers to attend to their personal commitments such as ensuring admissions for their children in schools and colleges. Hence, it is absolutely necessary to extend the holidays,” he contends.

RELATED NEWS

Bench, bar in battle of witsFebruary 22, 2013

Bench to function with 15 judges August 5, 2012