Petition challenging appointment of GRI VC dismissed

September 27, 2013 10:45 am | Updated June 02, 2016 03:30 pm IST - MADURAI:

The Madras High Court bench here on Thursday dismissed a petition filed by the dean in the faculty of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry of the Gandhigram Rural Institute (GRI) challenging the appointment of the dean in the faculty of English and Foreign Languages as the vice-chancellor (in-charge) of the GRI.

Justice S. Nagamuthu held in his order that the petition is liable to be dismissed on the grounds that the petitioner, T. Senthivel, had misappropriated the GRI’s funds on several occasions.

The petitioner had claimed in his petition that as per the statute of the GRI, the seniormost dean should perform the duties of the vice-chancellor if there was an interim vacancy.

According to the petitioner, Vice-Chancellor S.M.Ramasamy had relinquished his office on September 9, 2013.

He is the seniormost dean in the GRI, but the Registrar issued an impugned order on September 10, 2013 appointing A. Joseph Durairaj, the dean of the faculty of English and Foreign Languages, as the vice-chancellor in-charge, he alleged.

Based on the petition, Justice Nagamuthu had issued an interim stay on the appointment of Mr. Durairaj as the vice chancellor in-charge of the GRI.

On Thursday, N. Narayanasamy, the Registrar of the GRI, submitted a counter affidavit alleging that the petitioner had misappropriated the GRI’s funds while he was in-charge of a watershed training programme in 2008. Mr. Senthivel was reprimanded by the Syndicate for his conduct, he added.

Despite being reprimanded by the Syndicate, the petitioner misappropriated the GRI’s funds in 2009 and 2010 as well, and an inquiry was pending, the Registrar claimed. Mr. Durairaj was appointed the vice chancellor in-charge after obtaining approval from the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD).

The GRI and the MHRD were correct in overlooking the petitioner while appointing the vice chancellor in-charge because of questions about his ‘financial integrity and the subsequent inquiry.’ The petitioner might have misappropriated at least Rs. 10 lakh of the GRI’s money, the Registrar alleged.

Justice Nagamuthu recorded the Registrar’s submissions, vacated the interim stay and dismissed the petition.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.