Madras HC Bench sets aside conviction in minor rape case

March 19, 2015 12:00 am | Updated 03:09 pm IST - MADURAI:

After a full fledged trial, a Mahila Court in Tirunelveli convicted the accused on charges of rape as well as cheating on November 11, 2011. File photo

After a full fledged trial, a Mahila Court in Tirunelveli convicted the accused on charges of rape as well as cheating on November 11, 2011. File photo

The Madras High Court Bench here has set aside the conviction and 10 years of rigorous imprisonment imposed in a rape case after observing that the victim, a 17-year-old girl, had had consensual sex with the accused and therefore not entitled to press the charge of rape.

Partly allowing a criminal appeal filed by Emarajan of Tirunelveli district, Justice M. Sathyanarayanan confirmed the appellant's conviction under the charge of cheating alone since he did not keep up a promise made by him to the victim as well as her parents to marry her.

However, the judge modified the punishment of rigorous imprisonment for a year, imposed by the trial court under the charge of cheating, and held that it would be enough if he pays a fine of Rs.1 lakh to be deposited in a bank in the name of the male child that was born to the victim and the accused.

The judge also recorded the submission of Additional Public Prosecutor C. Ramesh as well as defence counsel D. Srinivasaraghavan that the girl had given the child in adoption to a wealthy Muslim couple before marrying another individual and begetting two children through him.

Recalling the history of the case, the judge pointed out that the parents of the victim had reportedly come to know of the relationship between her and the accused, who was their distant relative, only when she was in the advanced stage of pregnancy in 2006.

The victim’s parents initially tried to get her married to the accused. But their efforts did not fructify and hence they chose to lodge a police complaint.

After a full fledged trial, a Mahila Court in Tirunelveli convicted the accused on charges of rape as well as cheating on November 11, 2011.

Pointing out that the victim had studied up to Class IX besides undergoing a tailoring course and taking up a job in a tailoring shop, Mr. Justice Sathyanarayanan said: “Therefore, it cannot be said that being a grown up girl, she was not aware of the consequences of having a physical relationship with an opposite sex.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.