HC says it may summon Union and State Home Secretaries

If they do not respond to court orders by September 18

September 16, 2014 11:13 am | Updated 11:13 am IST - MADURAI:

The Madras High Court Bench here on Monday warned that it might be constrained to summon Union and State Home Secretaries if they did not spell out their stand by Thursday on making police protection for witnesses in criminal cases, a statutory requirement.

Justice N. Kirubakaran also expressed his displeasure over the government counsel not having obtained instructions despite a direction passed by the court on August 25 in view of steep decline in conviction rate due to witnesses being forced to turn hostile through threat and coercion.

The judge issued a similar warning in another case in which he had sought the views of the Centre and the State on enacting special laws on the lines of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999, for controlling organised crime committed through mercenaries.

In the first case, the judge had sought the information following a petition filed by an eye witness in a murder case challenging the refusal of a Sessions Court in Pudukottai district to recall the evidence adduced by him in favour of the accused due to threat to his life.

Expressing shock over the petitioner’s averments, the judge had said: “If the facts narrated by him are true, it is a very dangerous situation in which the witnesses are threatened and made hostile by the accused to obtain acquittal from criminal cases.

“The decline in the rate of conviction and the increase in the rate of acquittal in our country is due to the absence of protection to the witnesses. Witness protection is one of the important issues in criminal cases. Otherwise, the administration of criminal justice would continue to be in danger and it is not good for society. “Heinous crimes like murders and kidnappings have been increasing in the past 20 to 25 years. Therefore, the time has come to examine the condition by the governments concerned very seriously.”

In the second case related to organised crime, the judge wanted to know why a legislation, prescribing stringent punishment, should not be enacted to curtail the practice of people engaging mercenaries to commit offences such as kidnapping and murder.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.