HC gives ultimatum for vacating shops in Palani

March 17, 2014 12:55 pm | Updated May 19, 2016 09:17 am IST - MADURAI:

The Madras High Court Bench here on Friday fixed an ultimatum for vacating 10 shopkeepers who had been occupying the sides of the hilly pathway leading to Sri Dhandayuthapaniswamy Temple in Palani in Dindigul district. They had been squatting on the property for nearly 14 years though their lease period had expired in 2000.

A Division Bench comprising Justices V. Ramasubramanian and V.M. Velumani vacated an interim stay granted by another Division Bench in favour of the shop owners in January this year and dismissed a writ petition filed by them. The judges also directed the petitioners to file an affidavit in the court by March 18 undertaking to vacate the shops within 30 days.

Writing the judgement for the Bench, Mr.Justice Ramasubramanian pointed out that the shopkeepers had lost the legal battle in 2000 itself when the High Court rejected their plea to continue the lease. Nevertheless, then the court gave them 45 days’ time to vacate the shops. Taking advantage of the concession, the petitioners had continued for nearly 14 years.

Stating that after the dismissal of the present writ appeal too, the appellant’s counsel sought 30 days’ time to vacate the shops, the judge said: “This only reminds us of the proverb — once bitten, twice shy.” In order to ensure that the shop owners vacate the shops this time without hoodwinking the court, the judge ordered them to swear an affidavit.

He recorded the submission of the counsel for the temple, K. Govindarajan, that after the completion of the 45 days granted by the court in 2000, the temple management had issued notices to the shopkeepers. But they dragged the issue by filing appeals after appeals before the statutory authorities concerned before approaching the court with the present writ petition.

Holding that the petitioners had exhausted all legal remedies available to them and the authorities concerned too had followed the procedures scrupulously, the judge said the petitioners must bear in mind that “at one point of time or the other, every lease or licence should come to an end, including the right to live in this world”.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.