Commission for Protection of Child Rights gets full strength

Judges commend Social Welfare Department’s speed in issuing a G.O.

February 28, 2014 12:55 pm | Updated May 18, 2016 11:14 am IST - MADURAI:

The Social Welfare Department has acted with unprecedented speed in issuing a Government Order appointing six members to the State Commission for Protection of Child Rights on Tuesday, the day when The Hindu reported the news of the Madras High Court Bench having expressed pain and anguish over inordinate delay in appointing the members.

The Government Order was produced before a Division Bench comprising Justice R. Sudhakar and Justice V.M. Velumani on Thursday by Special Government Pleader V.R. Shanmuganathan. The judges commended Social Welfare Secretary P.M. Basheer Ahmed for having taken steps on a war footing to constitute the commission in full as ordered by them on January 20.

The order was passed on a public interest litigation petition taken up by the court suo motu following a news report titled ‘Children hired and forced into begging in Tirunelveli’ in The Hindu on August 18, 2011. While hearing the case, the court wanted to know if the State Government had constituted a commission under the Commissions for Protection of Child Rights Act 2005.

It was told that a Government Order constituting the State Commission was issued only on March 28, 2012, and another order appointing Saraswathi Rangasami as its Chairperson was issued on January 2, 2013. However, the members of the commission had not been appointed.

Holding that the commission might not be able to function effectively without the statutory requirement of six members, the court had ordered their appointment forthwith on January 20.

The court also directed the Social Welfare Department to report compliance of its order by February 3. But the department did not comply with the orders despite taking several adjournments. On Monday, a counter affidavit was filed on behalf of Mr.Ahmed stating that the proposal for appointment of members was under the active consideration of the government.

Displeased with such a general statement made by the Secretary, the Division Bench observed: “This court is not satisfied with the affidavit filed by the Social Welfare Secretary and the speed with which the file is moving for the appointment of six members to the Commission… We are pained to state that the court is being forced to push the department to perform even its statutory duty.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.