Child protection officers relieved of duty in violation of HC order, alleges NGO

They include Dharmapuri DCPO, who levelled allegations against Minister

September 24, 2017 07:14 am | Updated March 13, 2018 12:03 am IST - MADURAI

Through a government order issued on Thursday, the Social Defence Department (SDD) has failed to renew the contracts of District Child Protection Officers (DCPO) of four districts and has instead appointed Probation Officers (PO) or Superintendents of the department as DCPOs on an ‘adhoc basis,’ allegedly in violation of a 2015 Madras High Court order.

The terminated DCPOs include J. Raja Meenakshi of Dharmapuri district, who recently levelled corruption allegations against Minister for Social Welfare and Nutritious Noon Meal Programme V. Saroja, under whom the department functions. Other terminated DCPOs are from Virudhunagar, Tiruvarur and Namakkal districts.

The four DCPOs, like those of other districts, were appointed following the 2015 High Court order and were working on a six-monthly contract since 2016.

Apart from this, the DCPO posts of Theni and Krishnagiri, which were lying vacant, have also been filled by the headmistress of a government-run children’s home and a PO respectively.

Stating that the system of six-monthly contract itself was a violation of the Integrated Child Protection Scheme (ICPS) guidelines that demand the minimum tenure of a DCPO to be three years, one of the terminated DCPOs said, “Every time our contract expires, it is renewed in few weeks’ time with retrospective effect.”

“However, on Thursday, we received a call from the State Child Protection Society office, informing us that we have been relieved [of our duties] with immediate effect. I was involved in the inquiry into a child abuse case at that time,” the DCPO added.

‘A blatant violation’

A. Narayanan, director, Change India, and the petitioner in the 2015 case, alleged that the move was a blatant violation of the recommendations of the four-member Juvenile Justice Committee, which included its Chairman Justice S. Manikumar, based on which the Madras High Court issued its order.

A top SDD official denied the allegation that the appointments were a violation of the High Court order, since the POs and Superintendents would dedicatedly be serving as DCPOs and not as additional charge. “The government would soon take steps to fill the vacancies created by the transfer of these officials as DCPOs,” he added.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.