Net restoration plan remains a non-starter

June 29, 2015 12:00 am | Updated April 03, 2016 05:49 am IST - Kochi:

The Chinese bet on the Chinese fishing nets of Fort Kochi last July had sent the State Department of Tourism into a tizzy, forcing the announcement of a project for renovation and restoration of the hard-to-maintain contraptions that have come to define the bustling shores of West Kochi.

The support pledged by a visiting Chinese delegation was the proverbial last straw for the State, which suddenly woke up to the strategic significance of the harbour and committed Rs 1.57 crore for the restoration of these nets to their past glory.

The pace of the announcement, it later turned out, was in stark contrast to action, rather the lack of it, on ground. Ironically, the project that was fast-tracked after court intervention, hasn’t moved an inch ever since.

Consultancy firm Kitco, which was roped in to layout the restoration plan under Cochin Heritage Zone Conservation Society’s oversight, was awarded an initial grant of around Rs. 76 lakh to firm up the layout plan for the restoration work and identify the right kind of material.

The over five-centuries old cantilever fishing devices had been originally set up using a teak wood platform with a clutch of bamboo poles erected on it.

Over time, non-availability and cost of teak forced several net owners to look for cheaper options like steel pipes in place of teak.

Ideally, teak grown on rocky surface is suited for structural work of Chinese nets located on the harbour, where they are to withstand heavy currents in different directions unlike the ones deployed along the still backwaters, points out Mr. Antony.

Now, the restoration plan envisaged reversing the structural frame of the nets to its original material of teak and bamboo combine for durability, cost-effective maintenance and aesthetic appeal, he adds. “But the project has been in limbo, with Kitco and the Heritage Zone Conservation Society apparently failing to deliver,” admits tourism director P.I. Sheikh Pareed.

“Forest department’s permission could not be obtained for procurement of right quality teak. But that’s a silly excuse,” he says.

Meanwhile, Mr. Antony says he’ll move court all over again unless restoration work gets under way before January.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.