High Court seeks inquiry report on IPS officer

February 03, 2016 12:00 am | Updated 05:45 am IST - KOCHI:

R. Sreelekha

R. Sreelekha

Close on the heels of Additional Director General of Police R. Sreelekha accusing Transport Commissioner Tomin J. Thachankary of instigating a person to file a complaint against her in the Thrissur Vigilance Court, the Kerala High Court on Tuesday ordered the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB) to produce a report of the preliminary inquiry, if any, conducted into the allegations levelled against her.

Justice P. Ubaid issued the directive on a writ petition filed by the senior IPS officer challenging the Vigilance Court directive to lodge an FIR and conduct an investigation into the allegations against her on a complaint filed by P.P. Johnson of Chalakkudy.

The allegation was that the Motor Vehicles Department had allowed conversion of old buses into educational institution buses, causing substantial loss to the exchequer by way of reduction in the motor vehicle tax. According to the complaint, this had happened when she was holding the post of Transport Commissioner.

According to her, the bus owners would often sell their old vehicles to educational institutions and transfer the ownership in the name of educational institution. This was permissible under the Motor Vehicles Act, Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules and Motor Vehicles Taxation Act.

Mr. Sreelekha said therefore, the allegations were without any basis. The complaint was unsustainable and filed without understanding the provisions of the motor vehicle Act and Rules. It was common that the second class buses purchased by the educational institutions got converted to educational buses. In fact, the Motor Vehicle Inspector and Deputy Transport Commissioner, central zone, had conducted an independent inquiry and found that the allegations were baseless.

She said that no cognisance offence could be made out from the complaint. The forwarding of the complaint by the Vigilance court to the police was abuse of process of the court. There was no illegality in the action of the contact carriage owners selling their obsolete buses and educational institutions purchasing those vehicles.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.