Brexit-like trends will impact economy: Arvind Subramanian

India a more open economy than China, says economist

March 13, 2017 09:37 pm | Updated March 14, 2017 08:05 am IST

Arvind Subramanian, Chief Economic Adviser to the Government of India, delivering the 15th K.P. Hormis Memorial Lecture in the city on Monday.

Arvind Subramanian, Chief Economic Adviser to the Government of India, delivering the 15th K.P. Hormis Memorial Lecture in the city on Monday.

KOCHI: The year 2016 could go down in history as the year in which several developed nations started withdrawing themselves from globalisation, as exemplified by Brexit. And the phenomenon will have an impact on the Indian growth story, Arvind Subramanian, Chief Economic Advisor to the Union government, said here on Monday.

He was delivering the 15th K.P. Hormis Memorial Lecture organised by the Federal Bank K.P. Hormis Memorial Foundation in honour of the bank’s founder. Mr. Subramanian spoke on ‘Surprises of Indian Economy’.

According to him, one of the surprises has been the Indian model of democratic and material development. “While the West took a long time to develop its democratic institutions and achieve economic progress, eastern countries like Japan, China, and Korea have taken shorter time to achieve material prosperity. However, some of them are still not democratic. India has developed political institutions even before achieving the level of material prosperity in the other two categories of countries,” he said.

Another surprise is the large-scale migration of people. Around eight to nine million people migrate within India annually, and that bodes well for the economy as workers will be available where they are needed, Mr. Subramanian said. “It was thought earlier that only four to five million people migrated annually. This stands out because southern States like Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and West Bengal have an ageing population in contrast to the younger population in northern States like Uttar Pradesh and Bihar,” he added.

The economist said India was a more open economy than China. “A study of the developmental programmes has shown that the targeted population stood to benefit. At the same time, a greater part of the country has lagged in the provision of health care and education. Political parties do not canvass votes promising better education and health care,” Mr. Subramanian observed.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.