‘Missing’ CI of Nalgonda returns

Rubbishing rumours, he says he wanted to take a break from tiring work schedule

February 03, 2018 10:18 pm | Updated February 04, 2018 06:29 pm IST - NALGONDA

After disappearing mysteriously for nearly 36 hours, leaving his family and the police department in a shock, Nalgonda two-town Circle Inspector N. Venkateshwarlu returned home safe on Saturday.

It was a big relief for his worried family members. Even the police top brass heaved a sigh of relief but his sudden vanishing act and the return only added to the controversy surrounding the murder of Nalgonda Congress leader Boddupalli Srinivas and the investigation into it.

The murder of Srinivas, husband of Nalgonda municipal chairperson B. Laxmi, on January 24 assumed political tinge for various reasons. A long-time Congress leader and staunch supporter of Nalgonda MLA Komatireddy Venkat Reddy, he had joined the Telangana Rashtra Samithi a few months ago but returned to the Congress recently.

With top leaders of the Congress and TRS accusing one another in the murder case, CI N. Venkateshwarlu was apparently under severe pressure as he was the investigating officer. Though he ‘went missing’ after making crucial arrests in the sensational murder case, speculation was rife that his disappearance surely had something to do with the Congress leader’s killing.

But the Inspector rubbished all that on Saturday after his return. Speaking to The Hindu , he said he wanted to take a break from the tiring schedule involving investigation into two murders (in a second case, a person was decapitated) in his jurisdiction. “The situation was such, even if requested no higher officer would sanction leave. I had not slept for nearly six consecutive nights,” he added.

Soon after his disappearance, reports began doing the rounds that he was upset after his top officer had reprimanded him over wireless set, accusing him of mishandling the case. Six of the accused arrested in the case were charged under Section 202 of the Indian Penal Code (intentionally omitting to give information about offence).

A local court granted bail to them. Reportedly dejected over this, he left the town the previous day without informing anyone.

The CI, however, rejected those reports.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.