CBI Court dismisses Jagan’s plea

YSRC chief had sought relief from personal appearance in view of six-month padayatra

October 24, 2017 12:39 am | Updated 12:41 am IST - HYDERABAD

VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH, 14/06/2016: YSR Congress Party president Y.S. Jaganmohan Reddy at state level executive meeting in Vijayawada on June 14, 2016.
Photo: V. Raju

VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH, 14/06/2016: YSR Congress Party president Y.S. Jaganmohan Reddy at state level executive meeting in Vijayawada on June 14, 2016. Photo: V. Raju

In a major political setback to the Leader of Opposition in Andhra Pradesh Assembly, Y.S. Jaganmohan Reddy, the Principal Special Court for CBI Cases dismissed a petition seeking exemption from his personal appearance before it.

Mr. Jagan has already chalked out a schedule to take up padayatra in Andhra Pradesh from November 2, 2017 to May 2, 2018.

Mr. Jagan, who even postponed the YSR Congress legislature party meeting, went into a huddle with senior leaders of the party immediately after the court dismissed his petition. He was understood to have discussed the future course of action.

After finalising the schedule of his padayatra, Mr. Reddy filed a petition in the special court earlier this month seeking exemption from his personal appearance stating that as the Leader of Opposition he was embarking upon a padayatra across the State to learn people’s problems.

He moved the special court based on the High Court suggestion after it dismissed his petition filed under Section 205 of CrPC seeking blanket exemption from personal appearance in the trial court in view of his padayatra.

The court heard the arguments on behalf of both the petitioner and prosecution – Central Bureau of Investigation and Enforcement Directorate.

The counsel for the petitioner urged the court to grant exemption stating that the trial in the cases was yet to begin on regular basis and only discharge petitions were being dealt for now.

However, the counsel for both CBI and ED argued separately that personal exemption to the prime accused could not be granted in cases dealing with serious offences.

The CBI has filed 11 chargesheets and ED four in the quid pro quo investments and money laundering cases, respectively.

The counsel for prosecution also submitted to the special court that the High Court had already dismissed such a plea and that law won’t accept exemption sought on political reasons.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.