‘Banjara Bhavan’ may lose its heritage tag

Heritage activists cry foul over the move to denotify Devdi Mehdi Nawaz Jung building

March 11, 2013 10:17 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 12:18 pm IST

Banjara Bhavan built by Nawab Mehdi Nawaz Jung without disturbing the rocks in Banjara Hills in 1920s allegedly demolished by developers in Hyderabad. File Photo

Banjara Bhavan built by Nawab Mehdi Nawaz Jung without disturbing the rocks in Banjara Hills in 1920s allegedly demolished by developers in Hyderabad. File Photo

Heritage activists in the city have strongly objected the reported move of the government to denotify Devdi Mehdi Nawaz Jung building popularly known as “Banjara Bhavan” on Road No. 4, Banjara Hills, from the heritage buildings list.

Apart from being a grade 1 heritage building, it was the abode of great poet and Nobel laureate Rabindranath Tagore. Yet, the government authorities have de-notified the building from heritage buildings list, alleged M. Veda Kumar, president, Forum For A Better Hyderabad, in a statement here on Monday.

“The government should cancel the de-notification orders and initiate steps for reconstruction of the building. Measures should also be taken to prevent any new constructions on the building site,” demanded Mr. Kumar.

Prior to the de-notification, the matter was taken to the court. During the hearings, the court did not consider the building owners arguments that it had no heritage value and that it was in a dilapidated condition.

However, heritage experts appointed by the government identified it to be a heritage structure of grade 1 category. Further, they had declared it as having undiminished heritage value and found it restorable, claimed Mr. Kumar.

“As our arguments were found insurmountable, government authorities decided to de-notify the building without considering its heritage. This is mala fide exercise and is abuse of the discretion vested under the regulations,” said Mr. Kumar.

During the court hearings, it came to light that Gavva Constructions Private Limited purchased the building and was aware of its heritage value and its accompanying obligations.

However, it chose to demolish it and yet, the government was backing the move by exhibiting unfair favour to a party against the public interest of preserving heritage, he charged.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.