Uber rape case: Woman’s friend identifies driver in court

January 27, 2015 07:09 pm | Updated November 28, 2021 07:39 am IST - New Delhi

This December 8, 2014 photo shows Uber cab driver Shiv Kumar Yadav, who allegedly raped a 27-year-old woman in New Delhi, being produced at the Tis Hazari Court in the capital. Photo: Shiv Kumar Pushpakar

This December 8, 2014 photo shows Uber cab driver Shiv Kumar Yadav, who allegedly raped a 27-year-old woman in New Delhi, being produced at the Tis Hazari Court in the capital. Photo: Shiv Kumar Pushpakar

The childhood friend of the woman who was allegedly raped by a Uber cab driver on the night of December 5, 2014, identified the accused as the driver of the vehicle, in the court on Tuesday.

Ayush Dabas, who appeared as a prosecution witness, said neither the victim nor had he consumed alcohol on the night of the incident and stoutly denied a suggestion of the counsel for the accused that he had a fight with her or had physically assaulted her.

He told Additional Sessions Judge Kaveri Baweja that he along with the woman and other friends had gone to Cyber Hub in Gurgaon on the night of December 5, 2014 for dinner and while returning home, he had booked a taxi from Vasant Vihar for her from US—based cab service provider Uber’s mobile application through his phone.

While recording his examination—in—chief through Special Public Prosecutor Atul Shrivastava, the witness added that he had received confirmation on the mobile app from the company along with the photograph, mobile number of the driver and the registration number and make of the car.

When the cab arrived near the Priya Cinema market, he said he had verified the details and also face of the accused from the photograph on the app, following which the woman boarded 32—year—old Shiv Kumar Yadav’s taxi.

During cross—examination by Yadav’s counsel Aalok Dwivedi, the witness deposed that neither any quarrel took place between him and the woman before she boarded the cab nor had he physically assaulted her.

He said he came to know about the incident when the woman called her at around 2 a.m. and told her about it.

“It is wrong to suggest that I had talked to the woman before 2 AM or that I had threatened her not to disclose to anyone that I had physically assaulted her...

“It is wrong to suggest that I did not meet her after the incident till now as I was afraid that she would disclose it to anyone about my act of physically assaulting her and I would be implicated in the case,” he testified, adding that, he was in touch with the woman telephonically.

The court had earlier recorded statements of 21 witnesses including the victim who had identified Yadav as the one who had raped her on the night of December 5, 2014 when she had hired the cab and was returning home in west Delhi’s Inderlok.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.