Supreme Court refuses to stay nursery admissions

Agrees to hear plea of schools on January 31

January 25, 2014 10:37 am | Updated November 16, 2021 07:33 pm IST - New Delhi:

The L-G had issued the guidelines in December last which provided for various steps including abolition of the 20 per cent management quota for the grant of admission and weightage for neighbourhood children. Photo: R.V.Moorthy

The L-G had issued the guidelines in December last which provided for various steps including abolition of the 20 per cent management quota for the grant of admission and weightage for neighbourhood children. Photo: R.V.Moorthy

The Supreme Court will hear on January 31 the appeals filed by private schools in the Capital challenging the guidelines issued by Lieutenant-Governor Najeeb Jung denying them 20 per cent management quota and other criteria for admission to nursery schools.

A Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and S.A. Bobde fixed the date of hearing and said “L- G is not only a good academician but also a good educationist. The private schools take extra fees for admitting student in management quota. Let admissions go on.” A single judge had rejected your plea and the Division Bench also rejected your plea, the Bench told the counsel.

The L-G had issued the guidelines in December last which provided for various steps including abolition of the 20 per cent management quota for the grant of admission and weightage for neighbourhood children. The unaided private schools challenged the January 20 Delhi High Court order directing the Delhi Government to notify the guidelines issued by the L-G and also the date of admission. They prayed for quashing the judgment and an interim stay of its operation.

The High Court had said that the stay of the notification would be detrimental to the interest of children as well as parents seeking admission. It said “We are of the view that appellants (schools) have not been able to satisfy us of any irreparable loss and injury to them from the non-grant of the interim order sought. We are in agreement with the single judge that any interference at this stage would create confusion and would be detrimental to the interest of children as well as parents of the wards who are seeking admission”.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.